11736 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I noticed some things that are glaringly obvious:
1.You simply dropped a pawn in the opening. Better to expand the pawn since Ng4 and the pawn is already supported by a knight and h3 bounces it. Though black would likely play Ne4 keeping the tension. 4.e5,Ne4 now 5.d4 is correct opening lines and supporting the cramping pawn.
2.Nxd7 to take is usually a mistake, and the knight was supported by the pawn. Nxd7 and you release tension.
3.Qxd7 blocking the bishop is obviously incorrect (I'm looking from both sides).
4.Normally trading knight for bishop is incorrect. However, in this postion the bishop doesn't have much of a future and the Nf6 exerts an important influence over the center and supports the cramping e4 pawn, so an ! for you.
5.Bb4+ it's incredible how people will default to a check if they don't know what to do (if a move improves your opponent's position then it should be discarded) instead of the principle of the least active piece. Now black is slipping badly. 9...Qd5 would have given an edge to black by exerting greater central influence, threatening a piece forcing white to react, and opening his bishop's line. If 9...Qd5 you would probably play 10.Nc3 threatening the queen, and now 10...Bb4 is appropriate as it keeps the queen's central position.
11.Bd3 seems reasonable, except for 11...Qxd4! exploiting the pin winning a pawn. 11.Bc4 maintains an edge, controls a central square, and follows the principle of the least active piece.
11...Qxd4 12.0-0,Qd5 and it is unclear to me who is better, black has an extra pawn, but it's doubled, there's an open center, black has the bishop pair in the open position, which is normally a clear edge, though the Ba5 is passive, but the white Ne4 is pretty active, white is castled, no real way to exploit the centralized black king, castling is a realistic prospect for black, possibly on either side, Ba5 is inactive, but can fall back to c7 if needed.
Nice for you, obviously. I'm not saying it's bad, but work is needed. Everyone needs to improve. And good luck getting to 2000! It's impossible!
Never say something is impossible tliu1222! Just "really really really frustratingly, hair tearing out hard!"
2000 ? Hard? Impossible? Must be a joke o.0
lol beating a player that is 250 points lower and then bragging about it on the forums ? come back when you've beaten a 1250 :D
Sicilian Najdorf Poisoned Pawn Variation Theory
by Charetter115 a few minutes ago
by tkbunny a few minutes ago
My !! Bishop sac
by tkbunny 3 minutes ago
The Bullet Chess Handbook
by ghillan 4 minutes ago
7/28/2015 - A Delicate Process
by AndrewDallas 5 minutes ago
First opening repertoire for learning purposes
by Charetter115 8 minutes ago
attacking the english
by nobodicos 23 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by strngdrvnthng 26 minutes ago
Stockfish vs Frits 140/144
by hpmobil 33 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by nimzobogo 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!