12985 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
A tempo is worth about 1/3 of a pawn. It ain't rocket science. Sorry.
As for the OP's earlier thread -- 1 and 1/2 pawns is generally considered a "winning advantage." End of story.
is the first one a general statement or just for the first move?
and 1 pawn is not enough?
Can you pls show me your GM certificate?
Give this mindless thread a rest. So tiresome, the OP.
No, one pawn is many times not enough to win. Get off your arse and simply look it up in a good chess book. Duh ??
There should be a movie, named "The Human Centipawn"
let me makes this more clear: I'm well aware that 1 pawn sometimes is not enough. it should be obvious though that the evaluation of these positions is 0.00. my question however was how many centipawns is enough to secure a win no matter what the opponent plays. no need to be rude, dipshit.
It is 24. But only if white opens with d4. Otherwise it's like 13.
In all likelihood, zero.
1.5 pawns is generally considered a "winning advantage," ceteris paribus.
How dense do you have to be to not understand this simple rule of thumb ??
What planet does the OP hail from ?? Such a windbag. Please spare us.
How dense do you have to be to not understand this simply rule of thumb ??
wrong thread, einstein. btw, i seem to remember at least a couple of occasions where a GM resigned a game where the evaluation was 1.2 something in his opponents favor, and everybody agreed it's a clear win.
doesn't that contradict your minimum requirement of 1.5 pawns, genius?
You have started 10 moronic thread is just the past two weeks. Here's your latest --
Your prose speak for themselves. Have a Nice Day.
Not only does he not understand the rule of thumb, he appears not to understand what a rule of thumb even is.
New sock puppets too.
I miss the old ones!
You are playing in two universes and putting things into conflict.
In human play, one pawn, or even less may be enough to win, even in GM level, I am not talking about score, I am talking about material.
In Engine play, or evaluation, when the position is won, give your engine some time and he will (most probably) find mate eventually.
When you use computers to analyse a given position, the score it shows does not reflect the exact score in the given position. That is due to:
1. Engines are made by humans, who don't play chess perfectly.
2. Engines are super strong tacticians, but lack strategic view.
We all use engines to study becouse it gives us a fast, easy and impartial evaluation of a position we encounter, not becouse it reflects the truth of what is going on the board.
So, the (last) question in this thread: "minimum score to force a win with perfect defense" has no answer. First, becouse no one plays perceft chess (not even engines), so we can't evaluate the position correctly. Second, becouse +1 may be winning in a position (king and pawn vs king), while +38 may lead to a drawn (huge material advantage but the engine didn't reach the depth necessary to spot it).
We could do without them altogether.
Get Free Coaching
by brumtown a few minutes ago
Chess.com is the bomb!
by brumtown 2 minutes ago
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by Syd_Arthur 2 minutes ago
using disconnection as revenge for losing?
by zengalileo 4 minutes ago
Exchange sac and pawn breakthrough!
by tigerprowl5 10 minutes ago
Why is a queen trade better here?
by tigerprowl5 12 minutes ago
Solution to Avoid Lots of Sicilian Theory
by SmyslovFan 13 minutes ago
by chesstime107 14 minutes ago
by Brownsugarjr 14 minutes ago
12/26/2014 - Karpov-Huebner, Montreal 1979
by Ybling 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!