13157 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Accourding to me this lil step seems to be good study(tactics 15 mins )-play(implement)-analyise(look deeply wid friends or engines)
thats make u sound player ...
Form a consistent, non-varying opening repetoire and look through books on the main lines etc. Once you have done this study tactics every day (not a LOT of tactics, because you will go crazy, but maybe 30 minutes a day on HARD problems.) While this is going on, if you have a chess computer like fritz or rybka, play a lot of games online against stronger opponents (with your opening repetoire only if you can) and then go over the game with a computer and see what kind of positions arise and if you made a mistake, figure out what it was and don't do it again. I have a different username now, but my rating USCF has gone up hundreds (about 500 or 600) points from where it was, and I am now about an expert. This will take constant work and passion, but in a year or two, it is perfectly attainable. GM Alex Yermolinsky is a very wise man. Study tactics, and work extensively on openings like I have described, and I am sure you will see the improvement in your game that I have experienced in mine.
Best of luck
well yes in 2 years its really a bit short if you dont start as a kid, but i would say it doesnt need extra hours to become and expert. i dont think, even f i myself wont make it, it wouldn´t be impossible to just devote some spare time to chess and someday become expert. i mean i know im much weaker but 2000 i mean it doesnt look like the mount everrest to me, it looks much more like the stairway to the top of the empire state building, yeah it looks like a lot of work but everyone somewhat healthy can eventually reach it.
yes i know she was probably joking with books, but expect a few well written books for me personally most books are a verry unefficent. Also and please correct me, i dont understand how at a low level long games can help you? you dont have knowledge about positions you would like to reach and you also dont have the technique to implement you plans even if you had some. I might be horribly wrong, but i would think studying first most of the fundamentals before playing games would be the correct way.
Dont get me wrong, well probably most books are good, but then what do you get, eleven games??? and then they explain it, they tell the positional stuff but the forget what to tell what the master was planning or wanted to implement.. or they say give variation that dont interest you because you are not strong enough to assess the resulting position.
Seriously i think specially in this age, there are way more efficent ways to learn nowadays then just spend your money on books that may or may not be good.
I know a system that can help you to become IM at least! The GM Igor Smirnov is different to all the others GM in just one thing... He is not afraid on telling you the truth about how a GM Think. If you want to become a chess expert click this link http://chess-teacher.com/home#oid=1442_5 And dont postpone your chess progress... with just two of his courses you can become a Chess Expert. If you study seriously all of them you should become at least IM. No matter how old you are have actually. http://chess-teacher.com/home#oid=1442_5
i dont think everyone can become im, also its funny how smirnov had the confused look when finegold pointed out that he confused queen and king rofl.
no joking smirnov is really great teacher i believe but i dont think anyone can become im. ofc i can become im but not like everyone could. maybe you can become im when you have a lot if im friends and they let you win a lot so you get the title.
Chess.com tactics trainer will improve your game
Hehehe its just your opinion my opinion is that everyone can become IM at least. But whatever this conversation doesnt make any sense.
just my thought, maybe you are right i dont know. i would just assume its not possible. i also really think smirnov is strong, it was just a funny joke from finegold in his video...
7 hours a week to go from beginner to expert? you'll never get there. I spent almost every spare minute between ages 13-19 to make expert. 7 hours would have been one days play at the weekend. You want results? think more in terms of 30 hours a week.
An hour a day is completely worthless for most people.
I agree with this entirely. I spent probably 30-40 hours a week on chess from 12-17 whether it be at the library, club, online (msn zone, yahoo, pogo, world chess network etc.) mostly playing blitz games but also sometimes analyzing, reading a book here or there and reading articles. I think my very first book was The Vienna Game and I remember memorizing all the Frankenstein-Dracula lines of it and a ton of other dubious lines. yeah 7 hour a week or 1 hour a day is useless. Even now with a full-time job and teaching chess during the evenings I still spend 20+ hours a week keeping up my skill level
but you an im now. Now please tell me one thing, did dubios lines improve your strength?? were playing games without training before tactics and knowing about plans and techniques and stuff really improving your game?
wouldnt you haved saved time doing it much more professional, i mean playing hours long games, i dont see how can that improve you without the right knowledge before.
Also i would think it takes much longer to reach IM from expert strength than it takes to reach expert from beginner.
Sure I could have trained "professionally" but that would suck the fun and enjoyment out of it and even if I'm still an IM now I wouldn't spend this much time on something that I don't enjoy. I learned tactics through setting up combinations and I learned how to win winning positions. Dubious lines taught me what's good and what's bad and I just destroyed all the casual/club players who relied on dubious lines since I usually had an answer for it.
It took me longer to make IM than to make master but I got into it fairly young and there was no one around to push me other than myself. There's no one way to study chess and you can't set a strict plan for yourself cause at the end of the day, chesss is just a hobby, a really fun and time-consuming one but it doesn't pay the bills. The reason most kids don't last past college once their teenager chess-playing years are done is because their parents often make chess boring and forced. No one wants to be told what to study or what not to study and making hobbies like chess into a strict, rigid plan to follow might work out short-term but it will most definitely fail long-term
Countdown to 10^7
by czechsmex 2 minutes ago
by 913Glorax12 7 minutes ago
How Long Untill V3???
by 913Glorax12 8 minutes ago
7/12/2014 - Joseph Dollinger, Schach-Endspiele, 1806
by MichaelJRosenfeld22 10 minutes ago
The entire Blog section of Chess.com is gone! Is this due to V3??
by JamieDelarosa 12 minutes ago
French defence Korchnoi gambit
by Bryan_Urizar 15 minutes ago
by boombas 21 minutes ago
11 year-old vs. NM - please analyse :)
by chessdragonboge 26 minutes ago
How to get from 1100-1800 quick?
by Chesserman63 27 minutes ago
Why some people disconnect when losing?
by baddogno 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!