Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

I have hijacked this thread. Nothing to see here...move along.


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1

    MyCowsCanFly

    ^V^

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #2

    ivandh

    A little engineering on Carlsen and...

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #3

    MyCowsCanFly

    ivandh wrote:

    A little engineering on Carlsen and...


    I wonder if Judit is interested?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #4

    ivandh

    As a donor?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #5

    pdela

     

    How to create conditions where there would be a world champion who is a woman?

    why do we have to do that?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #6

    pdela

    do you mean this, for example....

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #7

    MyCowsCanFly

    pdela wrote:

     

    How to create conditions where there would be a world champion who is a woman?

    why do we have to do that?


    If you were an evil mastermind, how would you change the opinion of someone who asks. "Why do we have to do that?"

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #8

    PrawnEatsPrawn

    It's easy... kill all the men, only way to be sure.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #9

    pdela

    yeah, maybe I didn't make my point clear.

    I don't know how do you want to create conditions, I think men and women play with the same pieces

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #10

    KillaNinja

    MyCowsCanFly wrote:
    ivandh wrote:

    A little engineering on Carlsen and...


    I wonder if Judit is interested?


     lol what exactly are you suggesting..

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #11

    MyCowsCanFly

    PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:

    It's easy... kill all the men, only way to be sure.


    I suppose at some point, possible solutions would need to be prioritized. Personally, I would prefer this to be one of the last options implemented. Of course, I have a personal interest.

    Also, given my rating, I should be an exception.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #12

    MyCowsCanFly

    Given the number of exemplars produced by Russia, another approach would be to move all women to Russia.

    I just realized, I am one of the least qualified people on chess.com to participate in a serious conversation. Oh well.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #14

    JimSardonic

    Abolish a women's division. Why do we need WGM or Women's World Champions? It only stands to logic that if you choose to play in a weaker pool of players (of any gender), your improvment is hindered. I hope that's not as 'out of line' as it feels to state, but there is logic in the idea.
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #15

    VLMJ

    Women have beaten men in just about everything so far that doesn't take the physical strength that man is endowed with.  So why will it not happen in chess?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #16

    Dragec

    Jim's approach might work.
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #17

    trysts

    A nice selection of shoes would probably do the trickWink

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #19

    trysts

    Looks like bowling?

    "Kelly Kulick is a 33-year-old professional bowler who won the Professional Bowler’s Association Women’s World Championship.  A new PBA rule allowed her to qualify for the men’s tournaments.  She entered arguably the most prestigious event – the Tournament of Champions – and beat 62 of the best male bowlers, defeating the world’s #1 ranked bowler in the final match 265-195."

    http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/25/is-this-the-greatest-moment-in-womens-sport/

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #20

    rooperi

    How to create conditions where there would be a world champion who is a woman?

    Ban men from playing.


Back to Top

Post your reply: