18098 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
A blitz game I played....Took me a min or 2 but I knew be7 was wrong..Thank you tactics trainer
I guess he told you!
BTW, nice game.
i don't think Be7 is wrong.
9 .. Qg6 threatening Qxg7, exd5, Ne5 etc looks good for black.
hate when that happens I just did a bunch of analysis. Anyways simply castling after q-g6 looks quite dangerous for black. If they move the rook then both rooks will be dead for quite some time. There is an idea of f4 and maybe even e5 if fxe. Definitely not a position I would want to play as black. There were even some forced drawing variations in some lines(wish I could remember where lol)
Wow nice playing!
6.Bxf7+ is a lemon- in practice white has scored about eight percent out of 20 games after the (quite obvious) 9...Qg6.
After 10.0-0 Rb8 white has scored a (counter)impressive zero out of five. Even worse, most people that play the Philidor are rather aware of it, since it's mentioned in the books (e.g. Bauer).
Finally, since this was a 3-day correspondence game, it wouldn't be that hard for Black to consult a free database and find the refutation. Say something like that:
I recently had this position in a real chess game. I played 6. 0-0 and after the game my opponent showed me a very long forced variation and he said that it was very complicated if you dont know it!
Don't you just love a sore loser? I had someone type computer once... I took it as a compliment!
Somebody should run a Houdini vs Rybka on that position.
nah, we hv better - pfren
+1 brain power is better.
After 10.0-0 Rb8, a computer will count the material and declare white dead for good. In practice, white can expect Black to blunder something, but objectively speaking, he is lost. Agreed that 10.0-0 is relatively best, but still not good.
Computers aren't always reliable. I calculated a line in an Ivanchuk game and thought it was a draw despite being material up due to the bishops not being able to meaningfully target anything and the king being able to keep the other one away. However, the computer said black was winning!
I can't find the winning idea for black if there is one since it seems like the king keeps any pawn break through away while the pawns and bishop shut the king out on the queenside:
What would be the rating of a top chess player in the late 1800s today
by Pulpofeira a few minutes ago
3/6/2015 - Kasparian - Manvelian, Erevan 1939
by RodCarroll a few minutes ago
Learning 1.e4 e5 thoroughly
by Airut a few minutes ago
Chess.com and Internet explorer
by DuploCloud a few minutes ago
by kaynight 2 minutes ago
where I went wrong?
by Trevor-D 6 minutes ago
Is it stockfish or is it just me?
by ForestHell 9 minutes ago
How to Analyze position Scientifically (part-2,Identification)
by Earth64 10 minutes ago
by rook_rocks 13 minutes ago
Win T ornament Game Counts As Loss?
by Martin_Stahl 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!