21553 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In a few games lately if both players Queens are exposed when they are still next to the King, the other player will go Queen for queen.
Now I understand if it's for position, etc.. but it's always just for the sake of taking the queen even though they always lose theirs.
Am I missing something?I just don't get it.
Stops you castling. Maybe they're playing for a draw, or fancy their endgame skills.
If the the capturing queen has to be retaken by the king. I will usually do it just to prevent castling and keep his/her king in the center. The trade would not be completely even. Though material is even, the side that initiated the the trade would have a positional advantage. If the queen can be recaptured with a Knight on c3 or c6 or something else I will think about the trade a little longer but usually I will still do it b/c an opponent's knight on the back rank (d1 or d8) is usually better than having it exert pressure on the center from c3/c6. Rarely are trades of equal material completely even often they result in a positional or tactical advantage for one side.
But then again I'm just a patzer, and don't realy know what I'm doing in a chess game.
1. Stops castling.
2. Normally good for tempo - moving the queen to get yours to safety often will cost you, especially if your opponent is chasing it. Instead they will likely have to move the king to safety.
3. If you're up material simplification will give you better winning chances, and decreased losing chances.
I WANTS TO BECOME A "WORLD CHAMPION"
by yogesh79 a few minutes ago
Nigel Short: 'Girls just don't have the brains to play chess'
by soren22 a few minutes ago
Soviet Cheating in FIDE competition: Zurich 1953
by Marignon a few minutes ago
State of Chess.com Show! Post your questions here
by TurboFish 4 minutes ago
Teachers failure to explain N+B vs King checkmate.
by AIM-AceMove 6 minutes ago
Carlsen at 25
by Crazychessplaya 8 minutes ago
MSC157 vs. Pulpofeira match
by SJFG 14 minutes ago
If there were no computers what
by Pulpofeira 18 minutes ago
You Lose If You Get Checked
by rgf100 23 minutes ago
12/1/2015 - Kosolapov - Nezhmetdinov, Kazan 1936
by RodCarroll 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!