15550 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Carlsen was the new mozart and Capablanca was the old one. Doesn't matter on who is or not.
Yeah, and we don't need a certification institute to decide.
I wonder how "mozart" they really have become.hmmm....
Who knows the criteria here? What does it take to be the Mozart of chess? You need to chase women like Mozart??
Sometimes it becomes funny when we give titles like that when It could also be "The Leonardo" of chess or "Michaelangelo" of chess or "Sebastian" of chess. Any idea why the title "Mozart" ?
So the criterium is effortless brilliancy.? I would think Aljechin, Carlsen, Fischer are candidates then. Capablance was not creative enough.
Capablanca most often than not plays for simplicity. In his book "Last Lectures" he has emphasized on the fact that when a clear win is seen no need for other brilliancy continuation is needed. I think Capa is a practical player. Mozart of chess huh? then who is its Leonardo?
What were Fischer's last words?
"Nothing is more soothing than a human touch" ? (are we talking about his death bed words?)
"I could really use a shave."
What the Mag said.
Capablanca was not creative enough.
"My doctor's a what!?"
"Well, at least now I'll finally get some rest. I mean, it's not like they're gonna exhume me or something."
This is not going to last to 50 comments where players start to insult each other. Or refute each others point to where they are both wrong. lol
This is going to last to 50 comments where players start to insult each other. Or refute each others point to wher they are both wrong. lol
So... what is right then?
At least Redd Foxx hasn't shown up yet.
Turn your head clock-wise.
11/28/2015 - White To Draw
by abekiroz a few minutes ago
Chess Surface Speed Discussion Thread
by baddogno 4 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Frank209 12 minutes ago
Win percentages for specific rating differences.
by aman_makhija 17 minutes ago
I Tried the Slav...
by jelo-amie 19 minutes ago
new version of chess.com app not working on iPhone 3GS
by milan_i 20 minutes ago
win or draw by time-out?
by Lagomorph 37 minutes ago
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !!!!
by MarcoBR444 42 minutes ago
Chess.com gives me cheating warning
by SwissGoat 47 minutes ago
why i failed in this game?
by SwissGoat 49 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!