17382 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Even if true, no human is going to sit there and recall from memory the trillion moves needed to prove it.
I certainly hope chess will not be "solved". It to me sounds something like "can women ever be understood?" (apologies to female readers), but I feel like when I'm playing a game - a really good game - the end result is less important than the journey and the true enjoyment comes from each player in a give-and-tke situation and that's true whether the ratings involved are
2400> or 1200<.
I can't help but to think this is the beginning of the end of traditional chess. The computer scientist who solved the Kings Gambit has said that he is going to solve other openings as well. While no player will be able to commit to memory every possible line of play for an OTB game, once the "solutions" are posted online - as the computer scientist said he is going to do - CC play is going to be ruined because people will just consult the file for each move.
Looks like it is time to abandon traditional chess for Chess960. Somewhere Fischer is smiling.
Don't worry, there's probably more chess left than oil!
Have we even reached "peak chess" yet?
Chessbase just admitted it was an April fool
thanks there is still chess 960 if we arrive at that moment in time where traditional chess is already database., where it will become obsolete.
I still stand by my opinion.
Fortunately, I don't remember what it was.
In the distant future, the computer capacity may exist to reduce all possible chess positions to a Nalimov table base analogue.
But our brains will never be able to retain all that data for OTB play.
Thank the Lord! I could kiss you for posting this link! I believed the article and was really depressed yesterday because I thought my favorite game of all time was on the verge of being ruined!
What a relief!
Indeed, there has never been cause to worry:
my nephew dont play good chess but he plays playstation .there is so called emulator which is like a database for chess and can research for his moves just by cellphone.ive tried playing with my nephew but i won butmy winning didnt reflect much of it because he was not accomodated of something he forget to avail of the emulator .am not familiar with cellphone as it is very little for me to read and to punch so i hate cellphone but with database already existing i dont wonder why they find best moves if they know of it.,but i dont think they will have a respect for winning in their own way because it is another form of cheating.
Using an emulator is cheating in tournament play. In any case how can anyone progress his own chess game unless they use their own mellon? Losing is one of the best way to progress, not computers guidance and a fake high rating.
yes i have plenty of losses to a lower rated players than me,i have been playing chess according to my wits and knowledge and experience from continous playing .it doesnt matter anymore to me as i am already old,i just dont understand why they should have high respect for themselves inspite of consultation to database and still happy about winning.
you'd be surprised how many people enjoy deceiving themselves
ive been reading about psychology books for every other day,i found out lion stands for self interest, the greediest part of nature which we we call the lions share in idioms where everything falls for the lions mind.
i am reading psychology books every other day,people are like lions in constant search for prey .no matter what it is for self preservation or lions share in idioms what is obtainable is obtainable,lions are the most expess formin animals same also with nature of mankind., form of the greediest form of animals and also to mankind.which to ethics is the end does not justify the means and vice versa.
Wouldn't solve something from a "computer programming" perspective be having a lookup table that has "best move" responses from any theoretically possible position on the board?
If by "theoretically possible position" you mean position that reachable from the starting formation, then yes. This is different than every possible allotment of pieces on the board. e.g. it's theoretically possible (in one sense) to have pawns on both players' back rows, and (in another sense) it is also theoretically impossible. e.g. it's theoretically possible to have a board with a white pawn in every square in one sense, but in another sense it's not.
You Don't Think Cheating is a Serious Problem?
by Journeyman_Jim a few minutes ago
12/27/2014 - Levenfish-Ryumin, Moscow 1936
by maacos a few minutes ago
PAIRING UP PLAYERS
by PAWNOVER83 3 minutes ago
French vs. The Sicilian
by Pulpofeira 3 minutes ago
Fried Liver Attack
by IamVenki007 3 minutes ago
use of chess engines by player mrt888
by chyss 5 minutes ago
Please criticize me
by varelse1 6 minutes ago
Weighted or Not?
by DowdyTheFifth 7 minutes ago
Opening with 1.Nf3 and Bogo's Weapons
by cookie3 15 minutes ago
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by kayak21 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!