12783 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If my opponent only has the king, and I have two knights and the king, can I win?
no its impossible
not if your opponent makes the correct moves. but if he doesn't know how to play it, or wants to get mated, you can checkmate with 2 knights :)
Thanks for the feedback!
if king is in corner is works
What might be interesting to know for you is that with K+2N against the bare king you usually can't force mate, but this assessment changes completely if your opponent has got a last pawn. Provided it has not yet advanced too far, you can force the king into the corner and then, just in the moment where a stalemate would draw the game, release the pawn to redirect the blockading knight to deliver mate, sometimes exactly in the moment that pawn queens.
This process is quite complicated and in some cases requires more than fifty moves, which is, as I believe I remember, why in some theoretical positions the fifty-move-rule has been exteneded to something like 75 moves.
I think the rules as they stand say that 50 moves is a draw even if a mate could be forced in more than 50 moves. I believe it used to be different.
looks like i was wrong. . . .
You can checkmate with two knights, but it is very hard!
Checkmating with two bishops is a lot easier to do!
Against a bare king it is impossible to force mate (the side with the solitray can walk into it if suicidal.)
Troitsky and Cheron made incredible studies of 2 Knights vs Pawn, and according to Muller and Lamprecht in "Fundamental Chess Endings", the longest such task takes 115 moves!
According to Wikipedia (buyer beware), FIDE had at one time adjusted the 50-move draw rule to allow 100 moves for such positions, then down to 75 moves, and finally back to the original 50 moves.
The rarity of the 2 Knights vs pawn questions the value of studying this material...except for the pure logic invoved.
As posted earlier, 3 Knights vs King can force mate. Fine is the only author I recall covering this, but there may be others.
It's IMPOSSIBLE to force the king into it, unless he's already almost in checkmate, like in the example that appears to have been deleted... K vs K+2N is a draw except for very specific positions where the king is almost in checkmate, just like K+R vs K+R is a draw, except for specific obvious positions where one of the rooks can be won.
True you need a cooperative opponent
You have to read greatest Chess Composer Troitskiy!
He made it much clever, generally...
Why do some people post nonsense in this thread? Under normal conditions - It is not HARD - it is IMPOSSIBLE to force a King into a mate with 2 Knights.
I think that the original question has been answered thoroughly.
An interesting aside, though, is the three-knight mate. The third knight makes it possible, and once in a league match, I did it with four knights, which is almost easy to do. Try it out sometime, on yourself or a computer.
I accidentally deleted a precious post, leaving a response an orphan. Here it is updated: [say white has K+N+N, Black has lone K]
Even with black cooperating, it is well knnown that black can only be mated with his K in a corner (the position 1 and its symmetries): so what about position 2?
pos ition 2:
Answer: position 2 is unattainable however badly Black plays! White is on move, so what was the last move i.e. what did black move to reach this position? No possible answer.
Isn't it possible?
just fyi the '50 move rule' for draws is 50 moves without a capture or a pawn move. so if they have a pawn on the board, chances are they'll move it and reset the moveclock back to zero, giving you 50 more chances to work with whatever you have.
Only possible with a bit of cooperation and experience from the knight's players.I try never to end up with two minor pieces. Bishops are annoying for a mate too.
Try preserving your pawns(if you have any). In an empty board situation one pawn might well be worth much more than 2 knights.
8/20/2014 - Cheparinov vs Branko Macanga, Vukovar, 2001
by tjmaxattack1 5 minutes ago
Kings Indian Defense
by clunney 8 minutes ago
Got greedy, didn't castle. Stay in back?
by HorsesGalore 9 minutes ago
Can we protect our site from hackers?
by Billion_Tactics_Boy 11 minutes ago
best way to play against queens gambit.
by shepi13 14 minutes ago
Looks good. But is it? Black to play
by yeres30 16 minutes ago
by AKAL1 19 minutes ago
Free trophies (LIMITED TIME!)
by chessredpanda 25 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by varelse1 25 minutes ago
King's Gambit: What Is Wrong With 5...h5?
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!