If the 2700 is very distracted or impaired, yes. Under normal circumstances, each playing their best game, no.

He could probably be distracted, and impaired, and still win.

A 2700 player would beat a dozen 1300 in a blindfold simul while playing cards...

Remember Morphy ?

Rooperi, here is the game you are referring to.

What does Qd3 change? Notice that f3 is guarded by the d4 knight.

Heyy, so there is actually one game in 10000! Faith in probability restored!

The Universe is huge and old, and its only getting bigger and older. Anything that isn't strictly imposible has probably happened countless times already.

Our planet orbits a single star, our star is 1 in a billion in our galaxy. Our galaxy is 1 in a billion in the observable universe. These are a drunken man's rough estimations, but the point remains. If it is possible, it happens. 

If an omniscient being had commented on the odds of this exact debate occuring in some far flung corner of the Universe countless millenia ago, he would have considered it close to zilch.

Look at us now. 

Correction, Browne could have saved mate with e6, but black would go into a vastly superior endgame.

Well unfortunately (?) it was a simul, so I'm afraid it doesn't count.

My room mate has asked this of me, like is it possible to "luck" into just the right moves to beat a master?

They would have to be very lucky no?

My room mate has asked this of me, like is it possible to "luck" into just the right moves to beat a master?

They would have to be very lucky no?

2509 is far from 2700. That is an other level, ask any GM about it.