18257 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
definitely, if the 1300 player never resigns and lasts long enough for the 2700 player to blunder big time and lose the game...it is worth the risk...so stay in the game no matter how hopeless your 1300 situation is
with that atitude you might as well start playing lottery
a multitude of chess.com players are already playing in the lottery because they never resign no matter what the situation
2700 is really super-high. Very very hard for them to make errors unless put under the sort of pressure sub-2500 players simply won't be able to exert on them.
I think the best chance would be if the 1300 player happens to have prepared an opening trap with an engine and the GM falls into it in a simul/blitz or something.
I can't see any chance this is happening if the 1300 has to think for himself (not that super-GM's tend to fall into opening traps for that matter eitherbut an engine might be able to find a nasty one).
And it better be the sort of trap that mates or at least nets the 1300 the Queen for no compensation.
I wouldn't expect a 2700 level player to have this kind of hole in his opening repertoire !
Please, please let this thread die.
every 1300 player with Carlsen's strength can beat a 2700.
If that player had Carlsen's strength wouldn't he be higher than a 1300?
I just noticed that 1300 and 2700 add up to an even 4000.
The fact that it is evenly divisible by 1, 10, 100 and 1000 means, yes, you can beat a 2700 under certain circumstances.
Number Theory, right?
the 1300 player could be better, but not play online as much.
also the 2700 player could make a bad mistake.
Maybe,if the 1300 player's coach taught him a stratagy that is played only like 4 times in chess history and than,Maybe the 1300 player will win.But only in a small chance
after 10 beers maybe
I get careless and lose to people I could normally easily beat. I imagine this would happen less for the grand masters, but it is possible.
Should you get a chance and a queen and land,
Priests and knights and folks to command,
What's stopping you from beating the world,
Since all you need is inside your hand?
You can have a chance and a queen and land,
If you're not a king as a real king is,
Then all you have will be dusts in sand.
Possible: Yes.Likely: No.Simplest answer.
The biggest chance will be if the 1300 player is a sand begger and the 2700 player just stopped playing turnaments for 10 years,than there might be a big chance there
I'm not even sure then. Didn't Kasparov say Fischer was playing around 2500-2600 range when he returned to face Spassky again? Wasn't that around 20 years after Fischer stopped? He was the first 2700+ player, so a 10 year gap wasn't enough to drop him past the 2000 mark.
ClavierCavalier,I said "the 1300 could be a sand begger" a sand begger is someone is someone who loses on purpes to get to a lower rating,then to win in low rated turnaments and get the money.So the sand begger might of droped from 2800 to 1300 on purpes to win money,so that I said "maybe the 2700 didn't play in turnaments in 10 years" isn't really importent,It's just like the chance that a 2800 will win a 2700.
The first diagram demonstrates how a 1300 player handles an advantage against a 1900.
Of course, he would be more relaxed and play better moves after a blunder by a member of the WORLD TOP FIFTY.
Oh, I guess that evens the odds. Actually,a sand begger could be one who should challenge Carlsen but their actual rating is 657. This gives some better odds for the 1300's!
When did people decide to switch to d4?
by Gilasaurus a few minutes ago
An Extremely Difficult Puzzle
by ChessPatzer987 4 minutes ago
by Stephenson2 5 minutes ago
How Many Moves Deep into Opening Variations Do You Study?
by ChessPatzer987 7 minutes ago
How can I improve my tactics?
by ylblai2 12 minutes ago
Too big Ads hide buttons
by Caedrel 15 minutes ago
Analysis of the party with the engine.
by ChessPatzer987 16 minutes ago
9/5/2015 - Ragozin - Bronstein, USSR Championship 1945, Modif
by cutiepierock 17 minutes ago
The Hnerf Attack
by ChessPatzer987 19 minutes ago
Chess opening Explorer?
by notmtwain 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!