7839 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
They were likely better than 1300 at unrated.
the typical 1300 could not beat a typical gm though. Great question. I wonder things like that myself. :)
In india a small 7 yrs old unrated child have defeated a GM. Superb na. And now he is rated 2234 at just 9 yrs.
This is called mythbuilding, at least outside India. There is no such player in the FIDE lists.
In theory, there is the possibility that the 2700 will play pathetically enough to be beaten by the 1300, but the real likelyhood is not one representable by numbers. You can play as many games as you want against a 2700, but the gap in tactics, positional play, combinational play, and opening/endgame knowledge is close to insurmountable and the 2700 is pretty much guaranteed to win every game.
There is a big difference between 0 and 0.000125
Only in mathematical terms. In practical chess terms there is no difference.
Our planet orbits a single star, our star is 1 in a billion in our galaxy. Our galaxy is 1 in a billion in the observable universe.
Your estimates are a bit off. Our galaxy has somewhere between 200 billion and 400 billion stars, and the likely estimate of galaxies in the observable universe is close to the same number. The universe is around 13.75 billion years old, with an observable sphere diameter of close to 100 billion light years (expansion places galaxies much further away than we observe them).
Not to mention, our universe might be just on of a countless number of em.
possible i am rated 389 JCL but i defeated a 800~ player in an OTB tournament today (not to mention that my rating is now probably above 400
Ultimately though, if a 1300 player beats a 2700 player, has he really 'beaten' him? Really it would just be probability and incredible luck, the 1300 player certainly wouldn't appreciate the actual depth of the moves he made by chance.
Perhaps that 'multiverse' is only one of a countless number of 'multiverses'
Might be the case. :)
And perhaps that... oh never mind
Could be a hacker just like you, making that same statement in another universe far FAR away.
By your hypothesis, in a countless number of far away universes.
If there are other universes, would they be theoretically accessible through the conventional dimensions of X Y Z and T? Or would they exist on some mysterious 'other plane'?
Weird stuff - I don't know a lot about physics but it's interesting and sort of makes your head explode trying to think about it.
Weird is right. It's not my hypothesis, and I know little about it, but other universes would never be accessible to us.
A 1300 player can beat a 2700 player only if the 2700 intentionally loses. It is virtually impossible. It is even more ulikely than a 6 year old beating a competitively trained Nigerian Marathon runner in a 26 mile marathon. Those guys are really good. I believe they can run the whole marathon runnng an average of less than 4 minutes a mile. Same concept.
Not quite....... 120 minutes has never been broken
You're insane. Nobody has done that for 3 miles, let alone 26.
They average about 5 miles per hour, but that's still damn good. Update. I meant 5 minute mile. About 12 miles per hour.
Why does White move first in chess ?
by ElKitch 7 minutes ago
12/9/2013 - Mate in 3
by kingpuma 8 minutes ago
Mysterious Mate in 2
by Mr_Grizzly 11 minutes ago
Caro-Kann: Panov-Botvinnik as Black
by BillyCpresesnts 13 minutes ago
My "new" openings
by honeybadJR 15 minutes ago
Is the Caro-Kann the opening I was searching for or should I go for 1...e5 ?
by ozzie_c_cobblepot 18 minutes ago
Chess rating system
by AlCzervik 24 minutes ago
Chess Sacrifice. ...??
by sammynouri 27 minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by fabelhaft 29 minutes ago
by MHR84 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!