10698 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Can any one of the knowledgeable chess players explain to me why many of the higher level players NOT play Kings Pawn Openings ANYMORE?
Is it because they WANT to avoid the usual FIREWORKS or OPEN GAMES from KP openings? Or they would prefer more POSITIONAL GAMES which arise from Queens Pawn Openings?
I do personally miss the Kings Pawn Openings in this World Championship 2010.
What is your opinion?
If you think that there aren't any fireworks in these WC games, then maybe chess just isn't for you. haha!
1.e4 is not dead, it's been played lately by players such as Anand, Carlsen, Ivanchuk, Topalov.
It hasn't been used in the last 4(?) WC matches, but that hardly means it's dead.
I wouldnt presume to really know why they arent palying e4.
But i think the games have been quite good.
I would not say that queen's pawn games are necessarily more positional. Instead, what strikes me is that there is much less diversity in what basic sorts of positions and structures you see in them.
In the old days it was actually thought that there were only a handful of reasonable openings. Computers have apparently shown that there is much mroe palyable ideas than anyone in the 30's imagined. Maybe the what bothers top GMs now is the boggling diversity of possible playable positions after 1e4.
The way the matches are set up it is important not to lose the standard time game and put all your effort into the blitz. Therefore they play very safely and save their novelties for the blitz. If you look at the blitz games you will find 1.e4.
Strangely though, it does seem to make some sense. If you are caught with something you don't know in blitz, you might either make a really bad move early, or get into time pressure right away, either of which could be quite costly (perhaps this is what happened to Caruana in his blitz tiebreak game against Magnus -- if Caruana saw Magnus's line in a classical game, surely he wouldn't blunder like that). Although in tournaments they occasionally do blitz, I think in matches ties are decided by rapid games, but still, that's not super long.
It has more to do with the match-ups than anything else. Each player is seeking to find an advantage against the one opponent, and adopts the openings he believes best suited to that goal.
1 e4 isn't necessarily wild and wooly, there are many positional main lines in the Ruy Lopez, for example. Neither are 1 d4 openings always quiet positional struggles, see the Grunfeld Defense.
Besides, it looks like the players of the current Candidates (for example) prefer 1.d4 personnally. Maybe than in 30 years time, the strongest players would have a personal preference towards 1.e4 (and people will complain that d4 is dead).
Does fate (or destiny) plays significant role in the success of Carlsen?
by kleelof a few minutes ago
Can someone please identify this opening? (beginner question)
by CJ_P a few minutes ago
Ruth Haring: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by Indubioproaggredi a few minutes ago
How many USCF national master are there?
by ashikuzzaman 3 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer Problem Difficulty
by benkku52 13 minutes ago
Who are you supporting in the upcoming rematch b/w Anand and Carlsen ?
by Tactical_Fight 13 minutes ago
observe the diagram
by Remellion 28 minutes ago
iPhone app for viewing and analyzing PGNs
by Taurus23 30 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by mirasma 36 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by Pastuszek 57 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!