A better question: why does anyone care what abritrary number is assigned to the "value" of pieces? It's amazing how much effort is expended upon assigning random numbers to pieces that tell you "how good" they are regardless of the position. It reminds me of people on the internet bragging about IQ, another favorite topic (http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/any-others-with-high-iq-suck-at-chess). Piece values are a random number that mean nothing and prove nothing, as everything is relative and depends on the situation.
KNIGHTS ARE TOO UNDERVALUED
Sort:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.
Yes, but earlier you said: "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)." I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).
But where would you get the boredom that make you want to repeatedly comment on a forum that you don't seem to be contibuting to?
AndyClifton wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.
Yes, but earlier you said: "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)." I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.