Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

KNIGHTS ARE TOO UNDERVALUED


  • 13 months ago · Quote · #101

    waffllemaster

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #102

    VULPES_VULPES

    waffllemaster wrote:

    Listen up guys, first of all, just because my name, pic, and profile suggest a girl, don't be dumb and assume I'm not a boy.

    Secondly, although the title says "too undervalued", I actually meant "too overvalued".  Also anywhere I was wrong, I now stipulate "numerous" (and unspecified) conditions so that whatever I said is actually right, please respect my logical conclusions.  I also extrapolate these conclusions based on my very specific examples to general chess values.  If you disagree you didn't read my posts.

    Also my main idea, that knigts are on par with pawns, was just a joke, can't you take a joke?

    ----------------------------

    If anything else vulpes, this thread has been fun for me to follow for the loop-da-loop logic train

    Thank you, wafflemaster.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #103

    Phelon

    Queens are 8, rooks are 4, bishops are 3, knights are 2.5, and pawns are 1.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #104

    VULPES_VULPES

    Hold on. I didn't say anything about queens or rooks. Don't go demoting them now.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #105

    AndyClifton


    Listen up guys, first of all, just because my name, pic, and profile suggest a girl, don't be dumb and assume I'm not a boy.

     

    Typical girl logic.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #106

    VULPES_VULPES

    Hey. You're talking to a boy. 

    Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #107

    IrrationalTiger

    A better question: why does anyone care what abritrary number is assigned to the "value" of pieces?  It's amazing how much effort is expended upon assigning random numbers to pieces that tell you "how good" they are regardless of the position.  It reminds me of people on the internet bragging about IQ, another favorite topic (http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/any-others-with-high-iq-suck-at-chess).  Piece values are a random number that mean nothing and prove nothing, as everything is relative and depends on the situation.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #108

    AndyClifton

    VULPES_VULPES wrote:

    Hey. You're talking to a boy. 

    Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.

    Yes, but earlier you said:  "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)."  I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #109

    VULPES_VULPES

    You are clearly bored.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #110

    AndyClifton

    Only because you're not nearly as much fun about this as I hoped you would be.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #111

    VULPES_VULPES

    But where would you get the boredom that make you want to repeatedly comment on a forum that you don't seem to be contibuting to?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #112

    waffllemaster

    At least he makes redundant/useless topics more interesting Innocent

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #113

    Conquistador

    AndyClifton wrote:
    VULPES_VULPES wrote:

    Hey. You're talking to a boy. 

    Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.

    Yes, but earlier you said:  "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)."  I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #114

    Conquistador

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #115

    Conquistador

    That took a few tries to get it to post correctly.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #116

    Metastable

    Interestingly, both Andy and VV appear to use the same eye shadow.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #117

    VULPES_VULPES

    Metastable wrote:

    Interestingly, both Andy and VV appear to use the same eye shadow.

    WHAT

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #118

    VULPES_VULPES

    chrisr2212 wrote:
    VULPES_VULPES wrote:

    But where would you get the inspiration that make you want to creatively comment on a forum that is totally pointless ?

    exactly!

    I don't think I had ever typed that.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #119

    AndyClifton

    Oh great, and now he's Beethoven!  The worst thing about that is that it completely screws up Metastable's very funny joke in #129.


Back to Top

Post your reply: