9318 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
einstein_69101
Post #421 is illegal since black did not lose any pieces. White would have no way of doubling pawns on the e-file.
Right - but that one was easy :) Have you looked at post #402 (or 409) yet?
It seems legal, but I haven't worked out all of the details yet.
Edit: This might be illegal because white cannot get some of the promoted rooks outside of black's pawn chain.
ShadowIKnight
EarlPurple
I will analyse the first board.
White must have promoted the pawn from c2 and must have promoted on d8, capturing c6*d7 at some point to take black's bishop. Black's queen must have escaped to somewhere like e6 for this and the king moved to somewhere like b8.
Meanwhile white has got the queen and then the king out via c2 to let the rook across, whilst one of black's knights has captured the white-squared bishop.
I will try to compose the game to reach the position. Has anyone else done it yet?
Reached the first position in 26 moves each. Not sure if it's the fastest but it proves it's legal.
Answer to #68
cobra91
Maybe take away the two queens and the rook on h8 and see if its legal then =P
Strictly speaking, that one is illegal because the FEN string indicates that Black can still castle on both sides...
... then again, if we get too strict about the FEN strings, then almost any position (with 17 exceptions) whose FEN terminates with "0 1" is illegal =P
That being said, I'll just disregard the FEN altogether and call this "close enough" :
yep nice =P using the pawn promoted or not, rook and queen was correct and the only way I think :P
Yes, it was done over a year ago by MRO314. Have a look at post #3 waaaay back on the very first page.
EarlPurple wrote:
I'm interested by the text in the annotations box: "600MB, Fritz10.ctg, NEILSHOMEPC". Does that hold any significance?
If you take a look at post #81, you may notice the solution was already given... 17 pages (and over 300 comments) ago. The proof game referred to (as well as the original position) is from February 9th of this year, making it more than 2 months old.
If you want to actively participate in this thread, I would suggest looking at the [far] more recent puzzles and posting solutions to those.
Servietsky
Wow, you're a genious.... You solve every single one! I tried this one for 30 min and couldnt come close to do it..... wow
I noticed that white's a-, b-, g- and h-pawns needed to make a total of six captures so they can promote. That is exactly how many pieces black has lost which means that white's middle four pawns cannot capture anything and go straight for promotion. Black's center pawns can capture four times to allow this to happen. And the trick is to get white's promoted rooks out before black completes his pawn structure.
I'm running out of ways to congratulate you, but nicely done :) I do wish you'd use some of that brilliance to compose some problems, too, though - it's beginning to seem like I'm the only one coming up with new puzzles, with you making short work of them all... that's not much fun Speaking of which, could you find post #388 and let me know whether or not I was right about your last position being legal?
Oh, and you were right about your solution not being the fastest possible; my semi-optimized proof game for the position was 85.5 moves long. If you're tired of all my easy puzzles and want a real retro-challenge, you could try shortening this:
Don't feel too badly about not getting it; my last couple of puzzles were designed to be especially difficult, and in fact I considered it likely that nobody would get them. But I agree with you - there's a reason why his username is einstein ;) Still, it's great that you stuck with it for as long as you did; just keep it up and you'll be figuring these out in no time!
Here's one that doesn't involve a diagram: construct a game that ends with the move 5...Rh1#. Good luck...
I'll probably compose another one within the next 2-3 days. :)
You can't compose one with 5...Rh1#? Yes my random guesses work again xD
pompom
By 5... Rh1#, can Rh1# be a capture? Or does it have to just be... not a capture?
Indeed, the game from the post above yours fails because 5...Rxh1# is different from 5...Rh1#
So was I right? Its impossible?
oh wait I worked it out, amusing as usual -.- give you a hint, it involves a castle ;D
cmon its easy when you know how its done. you cant stop now when its already begun...
lol nvm. cmon its easy when you know its a castle :P THINK!
mae13
I've recently become interested in solving puzzles where you determine if a position is legal or not. For example, is this position legal?
Can someone produce a position that is legal AND illegal (depending on if the puzzle is white or black to move)? I should also add that neither side is in check.
Have fun...
JOH
i think it illegal for two reasons 1 the two blackbishops and 2 the kingside rookcant escape yet thepawns havent moved i mean
Early Castle Attack
by Catnap2012 2 minutes ago
I don't play sound chess
by dpnorman 3 minutes ago
Digital/interactive learning tools for Mac OS X or iPad
by JamesCoons 5 minutes ago
Is it true that you should not exchange pieces when your down in material?
by ah93704559 6 minutes ago
BLITZ 960!!!!
by MrDamonSmith 7 minutes ago
Where did disable chat option go?
by Liquid_Pro_Quo 8 minutes ago
6/16/2013 - The Last Attempt
by caparosian 10 minutes ago
6/18/2013 - Tal-Starodub, Petrozavodsk 1984
by polygamous_king 12 minutes ago
I'm just curious??
by donnata 14 minutes ago
How to play the Dragon
by franksmith 14 minutes ago