16437 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Can Some One Plz explain why there is/need to be such a Vast Difference in our Initial Increament/Decreament in Rating Points ( after our Initial 1200 Rating ) as compared with the later ones after we hv played a certain number of games ?
( hundreds of points ,initially compared with 1-30 or so points ,later )
I hv read abt the Rating Deviation Factor( RD ),etc ( Glicko Rating System Article ) but I don't quite get the Co-relation between them.
I've seen some people Win juz a few games consecutively,after their initial 1200 Score ,then their Rating will shoot up to maybe 2000 or so and those that keep loosing will end up with maybe < 1000 ..
and then their Rating will stay around there if they don't play a lot of games after that or if they only play with Opponents of almost similiar Ratings .
Will there be any lasting effect on his Rating if the Player is actually a Not So Good Player but he happened to play against a few High Rated Players who weren't playing well at that time n' he Won or Vice Versa ?
Juz Wondering ,
When you first start playing the rating system has no information on how good you are (reflected by a high RD). It adjusts you rating by large ammounts to account for that lack of knowledge. If you're a master, it wants to get your rating up to where it should be quickly. Once it gets enough information about how good you are (reflected by a lower RD), it slows down how fast your rating is changing, so it remains reasonably stable.
Now, if you get a high rating, and don't play a lot of games after that, your RD will go back up. Then when you start playing again, it will change rapidly again.
The rating doesn't really have a good "memory." If you get lucky against a few high rated players, eventually the effect of that will go away.
So the Aim of the Initial large Rating Adjustment is to get a Good or Master Player's Rating up as fast as possible n' similarly,a Poor Player's or Beginner's Rating down asap too .
Yeah,if a Player gets lucky or unlucky against a few High or Low Rated Players,s/he will hv to play lots more games to annul the effect.
Will there be any long -term effect if s/he limits her/his Opponent's to within a Certain Rating Category ? .. I guess not,coz they wld all hv their own RD's too.
Tnx ironic_begar !
It is the rule to follow!
@Shadowknight: That scenario shouldn't happen with the Glicko system. The RD should go up if a player is inactive and then the rating adjustment will be more rapid.
Inactive....what does exactly inactive means?
Imagine I am not playing any online game and my glicko is 30. In a month, without playing at all, I take a look and it is 60 (those are not correct values, maybe in a month it increases more or less, don't know)
Now, imagine I am not playing any online game and my glicko is 30, but I do start an online game. We play slowly, and within a month, we haven't finished it yet. Is it my glicko 60 even though I have been playing for a month (but since we haven't finished yet and hence the glicko goes up), or in that time the ongoing game made glicko stop?
The more general question would be:
Does the glicko rating change while you have online ongoing games if it takes long to finish them (and act as inactivity)??
99% sure that concerning Glicko RD changes it doesn't matter if you play online games without finishing them or if you don't play at all.
Further reading for those that want to understand the details:
There are even more detailed links in that article.
Magnus Carlsen not using standard chess openings?
by mecuelgalapieza 3 minutes ago
My win with the King's Indian
by Mainline_Novelty 7 minutes ago
I played this game with a 11 tear old strong talent
by DjonniDerevnja 8 minutes ago
Is Aronian overrated
by lol1919 9 minutes ago
Invent the new worst/most useless chess piece ever!
by watcha 10 minutes ago
Queen's Gambit. Accept or Decline?
by ChessEnthusiast14 11 minutes ago
Converting Chess.com to USCF
by camberfoil 11 minutes ago
Can someone give me a crash course on 2 bishops #?
by RonaldJosephCote 12 minutes ago
What will Nakamura's excuse be at Sinquefield 2014?
by rowsweep 13 minutes ago
by ellie100 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!