Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Lowest rating ever....

Jump to forum:
 
24th March 2008, 02:30pm
#1
by Richman
Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 233

What is the current lowest rating on chess.com? Or what is the record lowest rating?

24th March 2008, 02:32pm
#2
by hamham
Netherlands
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 34

That should not be answered, who cares, someone can't play chess well?

  


24th March 2008, 02:35pm
#3
by Richman
Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 233
No i just thought it would be interesting to know..why shouldnt it be answered??? This is a chess community and we should be get to know our neighbors more..
24th March 2008, 02:45pm
#4
by billgill0
Aint life dandy! England
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 15894

Ratings are only important to the chess player concerned, I think its the way the player conducts his play, that is more important to me.


24th March 2008, 02:47pm
#5
by fadingfog
United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 15

We dont need to create a post for this...just look at the "View Players" link...you can see who is highest and lost ranked and everyone in between....

Why do you care who is the lowest ranked?  Is it so you can boost your ego by feeling happy you're better than them?  Be more concerned about your game... 


24th March 2008, 02:53pm
#6
by misterfever
South Carolina United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 554
Yeah I agree - pointing out the lowest ranking would point out who the member is - if you want to know just look, no need to post messages about him/her!
24th March 2008, 02:55pm
#7
by Rael
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 5084

All of you are being silly. It's a legitimate curiosity, and everyone has checked.

 

scorpion_private 536 0 (0%) 11 (100%) 0 (0%) 6 days ago Challenge!
Kirbo 531 0 (0%) 8 (100%) 0 (0%) 34 days ago Challenge!
chessking90 521 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 2 months ago Challenge!
holyhellbird 521 1 (8%) 12 (92%) 0 (0%) 10 days ago Challenge!
LOVELYTIGER 514 6 (3%) 177 (97%) 0 (0%) 2 months ago Not Available
kevinbulls 481 0 (0%) 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 24 hours ago Challenge!
kasperski_SC 469 0 (0%) 4 (100%) 0 (0%) 3 days ago Challenge!
maggot 433 0 (0%) 32 (100%) 0 (0%) 21 days ago Challenge!
stEin 431 5 (10%) 45 (90%) 0 (0%) 40 days ago Challenge!
mimarsinan 333 0 (0%) 5 (100%) 0 (0%) 14 hours ago Challenge!
timmaylivinalie 223 13 (3%) 359 (96%) 3 (1%) 2 hours ago Challenge!
Polgar0 169 18 (6%) 272 (93%) 1 (0%) 2 hours ago

 


24th March 2008, 03:05pm
#8
by Locke
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 303

I think we can assume that those who have not been active for a while have simply timed out in all the games that they were engaged in.

And I think the worst two players do it out of jest. 


24th March 2008, 03:10pm
#9
by austenmc
Stanford United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 30
I agree w/ Rael: it may not be the most polite query, it is an interesting one. Not sure what it tells you though. For example, ;ooking at Polgar0's games (the current unfortunate soul w/ the least chess.com rating), most of them seem like timeouts. Looks like he's only played out a few games in his short tenure here.
24th March 2008, 03:20pm
#10
by eternal21
New Jersey Poland
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 399

I think KGB got to Polgar, and sadly there's no internet in Syberia...

|'| 


24th March 2008, 03:23pm
#11
by redhotman
Buenos Aires Argentina
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 209

 mimarsinan3330 (0%)5 (100%)0 (0%)14 hours agoChallenge!
 timmaylivinalie22313 (3%)359 (96%)3 (1%)3 hours agoChallenge!
 Polgar016918 (6%)272 (93%)1 (0%)3 hours ago

Challenge! 

Lowest rankings right now on chess.com 


24th March 2008, 04:31pm
#12
by Richman
Oklahoma United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 233

No its not for my ego..nor to point anyone out...Like i said i thought it would be interesting to kno..just out of curiosity...plus i wanted to kno how low a rating could go...like does it go to negitives and stuff...sorry to offend any1...but i didnt think it was heartless thread to post..


15th July 2008, 08:31am
#13
by danya
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 37
wow... i probably know how people get high ratings now...
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.