16246 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So like everyone else I recently got a message informing me of the Magnus Carlsen vs. the World. I thought to myself that does sound interesting but I think good ol Magnus should go up against a newer or updated version of IBMs DEEP BLUE. Just thought I would put this out there and see what everyone had to say. What do you think would happen? Would it be a multitude of games that are draws or would Magnus pull through?
IBM should come out the closet already if they ever want to attain anyones respect. Especially after the shady events of the kasparov game. I would love to see Magnus mop the floor with them. But alas, tis a dream that probably won't come true.
IBM is done with computer chess seeing as they had to cheat to beat Kasparov. Why else would they lock it away and never use it again...
I would have to agree with you there anthony.
I think raw man vs machine games in chess now are not interesting anymore because the silicon beasts are just so strong and they play in such a dry way.
What would be more interesting would be if computers could analyse games of a particular player and build a personality based on that player which was really accurate, not just the opening repertoire but the playing style and personallity. Then we could simulate something like Carlsen vs Alekhine :D
Does Magnus Carlsen want to lose?
I'd say Carlson's fighting spirit, will to win, and youthful energy will ultimately pull him ahead of the cold and calculating machine. There is something humans have that machines don't, and that's heart.
They actually didn't cheat. Their stock rose when they won the match, so it was in their best interest not to risk another match. It was a "quit while you're ahead" situation. Besides that, the evaluation output of Deep Blue's moves have long since been released, and the moves are already outdated computer strength. One can plug the games into Rybka or Houdini, and they already find holes in Deep Blue's play.
Some years back, I wrote to GM Benjamin about the subject:
Edit: Looks like some douchebag necro'd this thread. I didn't realize that when replying...
Kasparov was upset at the upset.
To the extent he was unable to see any games played by the final version before the match, it was unfair. But it was arrogance that allowed him to ignore that going in, he should have insisted - after all, all of his games were on the record.
It's not unfair if he agreed to the terms. You don't agree to play until the issue is cleared up, otherwise you can't complain after the fact.
How do you use Hints?
by SonofPearl a few minutes ago
What about taking away victories of closed accounts
by cshuenss 16 minutes ago
Feature re Resignation
by Chicken_Monster 17 minutes ago
by kingwsu 21 minutes ago
let's start banning people who abandon games
by petrosianpupil 25 minutes ago
winning on time....ethical. ..??
by Jimmykay 32 minutes ago
7/30/2014 - Mate in 4
by pbazan 34 minutes ago
this is very nice opening
by toadog7 41 minutes ago
by Here_Is_Plenty 41 minutes ago
by Samsch 46 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!