8805 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Other litle known concessions to Fischer:
1. The chief arbiter had to be refererred to as "Nurse Ratchet"
2. Spassky had to pretend to stutter.
3. In no contracts or written agreements was it permissible to use the letter "M".
4. Craziest of all, Spassky agrred to not excercise his right to a rematch until 20 years had passed.
Too funny and I'm a fischer fan lol
I've never been to India, but my friends who travel extensively say Chennai is the best city in India for a business traveler.
The issue isn't about Chennai's suitability, it's about following the long-established process of open bidding and awarding the match to the highest bidder who can meet the conditions.
I think Howard Wallowitz should be the arbiter
Here's a link to the original story that Wikipedia mentions:
And here's a copy of the FIDE memorandum that is mentioned:
If allowed, this would actually put Chennai at a distinct disadvantage compared to other cities.
Chennai, based on promises already made, submitted an open bid to FIDE. Any city can now top that bid. If Chennai wishes to hold the World Championship, they will have to increase their bid, which is unfair. They followed the rules.
and a new bid is just in place from paris..the game is on
Buried. Up to the knees.
If allowed, this would actually put Chennai at a distinct disadvantage compared to other cities. Chennai, based on promises already made, submitted an open bid to FIDE. Any city can now top that bid. If Chennai wishes to hold the World Championship, they will have to increase their bid, which is unfair. They followed the rules.
To begin with, as was stated in FIDE's own press release
"AICF would be given a first option of three months following the match in Moscow"
Ten months after the Moscow match (seven months too late) came the bid. Nothing in the "rules" say the bid had to be open. FIDE's bidding rules rather say the opposite. So no, Chennai didn't follow any special "rules", they were just given the match the same week Carlsen won the Candidates, when people had started wondering when FIDE would start the bidding process. Paris said they offer more money, and they also have a long history of organizing top events (since before they held Morphy-Anderssen). FIDE might still stick to Chennai and refuse Paris the possibility of having their bid evaluated, but they won't find it easy to get out of this mess without problems.
This all sounds to me like Carlsen throwing a Fischer.
by sreeragmeppadath a few minutes ago
"At the end of the day, it's all about money"
by RonaldJosephCote a few minutes ago
by Chessman265 4 minutes ago
by callogician 4 minutes ago
by Apotek 11 minutes ago
3/14/2014 - Mate in 4
by War_Same 12 minutes ago
Carlsen vs Anand rematch
by tigerprowl 14 minutes ago
Leechers of chess.com
by JGambit 14 minutes ago
by tigerprowl 15 minutes ago
by jac1yn 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!