16906 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
there are tons of different kinds of math: statistics, applied, logic, geometry, spatial etc. So "excelling in math" is in itself too broad a category for predicting chess skills. However, anyone working with mathematics on a scientific level must be intelligent and possess good logical and structuring capacities. But I feel the same would apply to fysicists, chemists, computer programmers andsoforth.
There might be some skills that are common to solving both types of problems. However, I don't see a direct relationship between math and the end game in chess. If you have found a formula, please share.
Whatever level of correlation exists between math skills and chess performance, I'm uncertain how this would be useful information.
No. Chess is not a mathematical game. You do not have to be a mathematician to play chess.
It just happens that chess implies a cool, straight forward, clear, ordinate and mehodical way of thinking.
And, it also just happens that that is found, and needed, in science, more especially in mathematics.
From there springs the idea of considering chess a mahematical (better scintific) game, as opposed to the emotinal human way of thinking.
There are more scintific inclined minds playing chess than do humanist or scholar minds (artists, literary persons, blasted politicians)
Edward Lasker in his delightful book "The Adventure of Chess", writing about what is considered should be the essential faculties of a good chess player said this:
--ability to think objectively
--capacity for abstract thought
--abilty to distribute attention (over a number of different factror)
--good nerves and self control
In a few years from now everbody will play either 1.d4 or 1. c4
by JamieDelarosa a few minutes ago
Schliemann Gambit group/discussion
by logozar 4 minutes ago
What is a good answer to the Ruy Lopez as a sub-2000 player?
by Tom_Brady_SB49_Champ 5 minutes ago
by ThrillerFan 6 minutes ago
Dumbest chess.com comment of all times.
by ISeeHowYourePinned 7 minutes ago
by timetoextinction 8 minutes ago
Geller and Tal had positive records against Fischer. Why? Explain.
by Darth_Algar 8 minutes ago
by m0ve 10 minutes ago
Christian Chess Club?!
by Lagomorph 11 minutes ago
Aborting Match Games
by Penguincw 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!