This was a really good game against little chess partner on hard, I was giving it full concentration too, I was not going to let up ! the strange thing is no pieces was captured it was a complete draw !? I PLAYED BLACK.

Weak computers tend to go a bit loopy in closed positions.

Truly is a game to be remembered. I am going to show some of my chess pals this! Because as far as I know they all lose to little chess partner on when it's on hard mode. LOL.

LOL

You would have to go onto move 72 for the 50 move rule. Its surprising with 20k+ posts you still don't know how that works. Anyways the 3-fold repetition would work nicely. 

 No it lasted a while. 1 minute you can't possible calculate anything what's going on. I take 15 minutes per move.....

(((((((((((((((((((((:

And the power of this is 2200 !

cool

Trust me it's not. It's definitely hundreds of points below that. A true 2200 player would thrash you mercilessly game after game..

Someone said on easy it's 1200, on medium it's 1700, and on hard it's 2200.....

That someone was wrong.

 Oh no it's 2000 on hard setting not 2200, so I still did very well!

http://support.chess.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kbarticleid=690

I'd say 2000 is definitely still waaay too high..

Well your wrong aren't you. It's there 2000.

No, I don't think so. 2000 is only the site's estimate of it. Your ability if you were to play over the board (instead of lie about ratings) would probably only be 1400 tops if I'm being generous. No match for a true 2000 player. I'd give it a maximum rating of maybe 1600.. Not just from that game, but from when I've played it a few times and beat it in every one. Something I wouldn't have done against a true 2000 player!

No that's not true. I have beaten a few 1500 people over the board. And I think the site know's there own technology better than what you do.  : )

It might be an estimated 2000 rating, but it is really horrible in some situations. You can beat it fairly consistently on hard if you take it to a closed position. I generally just sacrifice something to get a passed pawn and the computer never seems ready for it.

If that thing is 2000, that makes me at least 2500  (not likely). I don't see why you beating one or two people a full 500 points under what you say it is should make any difference to your argument.. If you were to play it in say 10 games, how many do you think you'd not lose?

If I was to play it in ten games I would probably come out on top. I have beat it on hard before, just never wrote the game down. It's never beat me only lost or drawed against me.