11403 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Did Lasker really won on that case where he would lose his knight on b2?
Yeah, that knight was supposed to be on e2.
Ill hopefully post a few more in my next article
This origin of this position is unclear. In Game Explorer, it's from Oakley P vs Nash W , but I've also seen it attributed to Feuerstein - Bennett, 1955.
In the first post, where Karpov blunder 75: Qf3???, why can't black play 75: ... Kc4, with a slightly worse game?
I could understand if it was Qb3?!, allowing black to draw with 75: ... stalemate!!.
Why not 3.. Ne5+ ?
I dont get OPs post, those diagrams are not correct.
these are very confusing
Well it seems to me that i made a lot of mistakes
The Bishop is supposed to be on e6 for that diagram
I kinda was in a hurry and made some mega blunders.
Hopefully wont repeat them :D
You have a good point and like a said in my description he had an isolated pawn (d - pawn) which I had forgotten to show in the diagram. Thanks for pointing it out.
If you wanna see that game for furthur clarifications I suggest you to check out the link below
How I improved my rating from 1000 to 1500+ in 12 months
by ChessOptimist a few minutes ago
by friscodelrosario 3 minutes ago
Some uneducated moderator has removed my content
by tkbunny 6 minutes ago
Why Not 2. NC3??
by Fiveofswords 6 minutes ago
6/29/2015 - Mate in 2
by Sun4Ray 10 minutes ago
Chess Boards and Correspondence Chess
by pawpatrol 11 minutes ago
Chess.com users should be REQUIRED to use REAL NAMES.
by Bronco 18 minutes ago
6/18/2015 - Paul Keres vs. Verbak, corres, 1932
by turkhuu_5 22 minutes ago
6/27/2015 - M.Tal - R.Dzidzichashvili, 1991
by bluebird21 23 minutes ago
Beating a grandmaster or an international master...
by ChessOptimist 24 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!