Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Mega Blunders


  • 16 months ago · Quote · #1

    nick_p12

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 16 months ago · Quote · #2

    nyLsel

    Did Lasker really won on that case where he would lose his knight on b2?

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #3

    nick_p12

    Yeah, that knight was supposed to be on e2. 

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #4

    nick_p12

    Ill hopefully post a few more in my next article

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #5

    melvinbluestone

    This origin of this position is unclear. In Game Explorer, it's from Oakley P vs Nash W , but I've also seen it attributed to Feuerstein - Bennett, 1955.

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #6

    ViktorHNielsen

    In the first post, where Karpov blunder 75: Qf3???, why can't black play 75: ... Kc4, with a slightly worse game?

    I could understand if it was Qb3?!, allowing black to draw with 75: ... stalemate!!.

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #7

    Winnie_Pooh

    @nick_p12:

    Why not 3.. Ne5+ ?



  • 16 months ago · Quote · #8

    Rasparovov

    I dont get OPs post, those diagrams are not correct.

  • 16 months ago · Quote · #9

    Oran_perrett

    these are very confusing

  • 15 months ago · Quote · #10

    nick_p12

    ViktorHNielsen wrote:

    In the first post, where Karpov blunder 75: Qf3???, why can't black play 75: ... Kc4, with a slightly worse game?

    I could understand if it was Qb3?!, allowing black to draw with 75: ... stalemate!!.


    Well it seems to me that i made a lot of mistakes

    The Bishop is supposed to be on e6 for that diagram

  • 15 months ago · Quote · #11

    nick_p12

    Rasparovov wrote:

    I dont get OPs post, those diagrams are not correct.


    I kinda was in a hurry and made some mega blunders.

    Hopefully wont repeat them   :D

  • 15 months ago · Quote · #12

    nick_p12

    Winnie_Pooh wrote:

    @nick_p12:

    Why not 3.. Ne5+ ?

     



    You have a good point and like a said in my description he had an isolated pawn (d - pawn) which I had forgotten to show in the diagram. Thanks for pointing it out.

    If you wanna see that game for furthur clarifications I suggest you to check out the link below

    http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008303

    Thanks anyways,
     


Back to Top

Post your reply: