16645 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@patriotscout. You're the only one who seems to have a problem with it. If you go back to the very first post it was started by someone whose girlfriend just asked "why?" Apparently there's a lot of us asking the same question. You've made your point clear and I never said it was about being better or worse - you did.
I said that it was originally developed becaused of men thinking they were better. I didn't say they are better, just disclosing the history. Obviously they know men think they can "stand on their own two feet" otherwise they wouldn't be playing in tournament with us.
I answered the "why" and went further of my perogative. I believe I have satisfied the original query and not taken a difinitive stance on the "who is better" question. I have no problem with it the system as I stated many times in my previous posts. Please return to them and reread carefully so as to prevent further miscommunications on your part.
It seems that no one is really paying attention. My answer was the original history. I know very well the ranking system is open on both sides. Please go back and reread my other posts to prevent your continuing ignorance. I am also going to block you since you obviously jump to the first conclusion you reach based on a poor understanding of the information previously supplied to you. As TonyH would say, "You're and idiot."
You are completely right chrisr2212. I should defer to the superiority they clearly exude.
I am not wrong. I am sorry you think so. You must be the most important player in the world to declare yourself correct over everyone else. Stop nerd raging and go back to the basement...mom might bring you some cookies later.
alright alright, there there, the cookies look weird though,
Perfect, now eat up and take a nap. Then you when you feel like playing nice you can come back up to the house.
You are not better than me haha. You might play better chess than me, but you are not better than me, pathetic.
Never called you a child. That is what you took from it. I never said women could not become a GM...you seriously did not read carefully if you insist that I am ignorant. I never declared women's titles are still meant to segregate chess. Pay attention please.
anyone want to have a game or two,
except that 960, I cannot do those,
or the 5 day, 18 day, 21 day move challenges, please not those too
When it's comes to women just cave, let them win, they never forget.
I was going on in this thread earlier about the joy of letting them get the better of me...you might as well...otherwise there is no way for them to get the best of you either....hehehe
Yep they will either win anyways or get used to making the couch your bed. I nod alot.
I paid $1500 for my bed and its like sleeping on a cloud...I don't care whats happening...I am sleeping in my bed...I told my wife my a long time ago....go ahead...beat the hell out of me....I'll just call the cops and you can sleep in jail and I'll sleep in my bed....I haven't had any trouble
it's one more way for women to bash men and claim to be victims of men; trot out all the cliches: women are _______ than men: better, smarter, more logical, etc etc. The truth is IT'S ALL ABOUT WOMEN NOW!! EVERYTHING IS ABOUT WOMEN!! I couldn't care less whether there are separate titles or not. I have bills to pay. So go back to your male-bashing and cliche spewing gossip, ladies
...you see ladies and gentlemen....we have another satisfied customer....
thanks you chrisr2212 you just proved my point;
the cavemane cliche; chrisr2212 why can't you think for yourself rather than just repeating 30-year-old cliches about men?? because thinking requires effort and you are too lazy to reexamine all your old cherished assumptions
It's "sweet of me to suggest"; oh how quaint. another cliche" the condescending know it all female stoops to correct the misguided caveman. Have you EVER had a thought of your own, or do you just repeat everything you hear other brainwashed women saying?
o' christie, was that Rudy Voyer? Vollar? or something in #379
this was him, in the 1990's???
the german coach
thanks chrisr2212 - you just proved my point again.
There are separate categories for women in any sport women decide they want to compete in.
12/5/2013 - Too Many Attackers, Too Little Defenders
by rise512 a few minutes ago
Why are live bullet ratings so low?
by miyazaki05jp 4 minutes ago
Kasparov or karpov? vote
by GSHAPIROY 6 minutes ago
Positional response to e4?
by Yaroslavl 7 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by aronchuck 8 minutes ago
Lebron James is "Kasparov"
by LoekBergman 9 minutes ago
what is this whole "carlsen plays like a computer" nonsense
by poodlemuncher 9 minutes ago
computer youtube microphone
by PrivatePyle99 13 minutes ago
can I be an IM before i die?
by mattyf9 13 minutes ago
Winning coming from a pawn down Giri-Aronian
by pdela 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!