9479 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I would like to make an Important Comment now that I made only "Computer Analysized 4 Mistakes, from 5 Mistakes. With Equal Number and Points of Captured Pieces Vs. Sir Dr. PhigNootin rated at (1390) now probably over (1400) of Chess Rated Mind Mechanism Accuracies. I , JulesM made 1 less mistake on PhigNootin yet Capturing Sir Dr. PhigNootins "Queen" , I for the 1st Time on Chess.com got into "Checkmate" by Dr. PhigNootins "Rook". The Computer Analysis showed both Equal Number of Points in Chess Pieces Captured, Also Computer Analysis said a made LESS Mistakes, Lower Blunders of only 6 throughout the CHESS Drama!! Sir. Dr. PhigNootin is a (1400) or above Category Mind Accuracy Chess Player , PhigNootins rating shows (1390) but those tiny 10 point rating are Easily Surpassed given Mr. PhigNootin the only Man to have placed an I.Q. certified Mind of JulesM= 156 I.Q.(78% Average True P.H.D. s Certified 20 Question I.Q.s, All Mathematical Linguistics Patterns!!). Although Chess Measures both C.P.U. (Central Processing Unit.) and Memory Capacity Accuracies of the "Brain". It does NOT Measure HARD-DRIVE overall General Science Knowledges and Updated Read Knowledges of the "Male Human BRAIN" Hard-Drives. Females are supposed to be Equal to Males, but I am Sorry , I do NOT see Females Conditioned like Males to Use and Exercise their "Brains" like Men are Conditioned to do. The Female of Humans will be very dependant on their Men to due Most of the "Mental Brain Logistics for them(them=Females, I am Sorry but even in the 21st Century, Men still Excel Females at Equal Mind and Physical Tasks, Blame it on Conditioning or Environmental Problems, but there were NO,NO Females in my Chemical Engineering, Compulsory Electronics and Physics, Mathematics in my University-College Classes of the 1980s', ALL Students were "MEN Only Science Engineers"!!!!
Finally, Mr. Kasparov of Russia Cannot have a Computer Analysed Mistack of only "1" or definitely NOT "0" Mistakes. If Mr. Kasparov of Russia made NO Mistakes and had "0" Mistakes by Computer Analysis, He would have placed "DEEP BLUE" by I.B.M. into "DRAW-Stalemate" Regardless if I.B.M. would have given Kasparov and Russian Computer Programmers the Program Chess Printout or NOT. Zero Mistakes throughout a CHESS DRAMA is Hyper-Computer Mind Accuracies Now, "0" Blunders too, and 100% or 00.00% Accuracy Values. DEEP BLUE would now only "DRAW-Stalemate at best with Mr. Kasparov of Russia NOT Any CheckMates". Since "DEEP BLUE" by I.B.M. placed Eventually in DRAMA CHESS, Mr. Kasparov into "Checkmate" it Requires Mr. Kasparov of Russia to make "1" Mistake throughout the Chess.com CHESS Drama. THE COMPUTERS STILL REIGN SUPREME!!!!
That's easy for you to say.
There are only two well known Kasparov's in chess, Garry and Sergey. If you're worried about being specifc you could just specify Garry, although most people will assume he is who you are referencing if you just say 'Kasparov'. Constantly saying 'Mr. Kasparov of Russia' is just too verbose.
As to the rest of what you said- lay off the meth. That stuff's bad for you.
What's with all the weird CAPITALISATION and "quoting"? It is HARD for MEN to Understand what OP is "getting at"!!
I imagine it's no easier for women.
There's no way I'm reading that amount of red text.
That's good to know. If I ever want to say something bad about you and not have you notice now I know the way.
Yeah do it in a long paragraph of red text and you're safe.
It all looks so much like English . . .
Well, nothing interesting, what he writes makes no sense.
He jumps from a subject to another. The best: Men still Excel Females at Equal MindKudos on "excelling women" at "equal mind", guys. Kudos.
Guess he just took subjects that attracted trolls on chess.com, chess.com polemics (human vs computer, Kasparov, women in chess) and, well, trolled his way to the bank in red HOT flames.
(if what I say makes no sense either, I'm just tired. sorry.)
JulesM has long gone. Must have been upset that his ranting in red received such a poor response.
Maybe Dr. PhigNootin & a couple of strong men in white coats finally found his hideout & brought him back to the institute.
Time for another "treatment"!
Was the original post supposed to be some kind of color-blindness test?
It must have been a red letter day!
8/1/2014 - Cserna-Pogats 1986
by Doorvagarg a few minutes ago
What happens if your opponent dies at the chessboard ?
by SicilianSveshnikov 4 minutes ago
1800s(USCF) Noob or strong?
by varelse1 5 minutes ago
How do I beat a 2000+?
by JGambit 6 minutes ago
I Don't See the Point of the Touch-Move Rule
by December_TwentyNine 7 minutes ago
Why did you choose the username you have?
by Depthless_Lala 11 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by December_TwentyNine 13 minutes ago
Premove in Online Correspondence Chess
by MeTristan 29 minutes ago
New member needs opinions on this chess board.
by OldChessDog 29 minutes ago
Bumping Old Threads
by MeTristan 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!