10203 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I entered this thread with an open and unbiased mind. After careful consideration of the facts, I have decided that this system is a giant farce for the following reasons:
Furthermore, due to finding the correct Q-sac solution to the Georgiev-Kasparov game in post #205 and your playing perfect moves at critical points in a rated online game with streetfighter, I would argue that your moves are engine-assisted and you are likely guilty of c-wording. I would recommend that streetfighter (or an appropriate admin) take the proper action, if you catch my drift.
for folks not familiar with e8 and Lisi, here's a nice you tube vid with Lisi explaining... this is what our hero, winnersp, is using to play chess. With those tables. Mmm hmmm. Right. Ab-so-lutely.
I am happy for you as your search line is cut here.:)
I refuse to work on your negative infomation,thats useless for my system.
work on your own and play better good luck.
There is no immediate way to attack the black king now -- chasing it to c7 does me no favours - he'll probably have to go there sometime anyway -- so I will capture the e-pawn with my attacked bishop.
I will now have 4 healthy pawns for the piece, black's position is still tangled up and I am quite happy
I have to say, though, that the system seems to be playing the best moves in a very difficult position. Is this because the choices for black are limited, being under attack/threatened, and this suits the E8 system? Or is there some other logic involved?
Also, is someone checking all these moves/tables/charts/etc? Independent verification is always useful for an experiment! No disrespect intended to winnersp, but I know I'm not cheating because I have no chess engine on my computer (pop in to my hotel anytime and check for yourself ).
no,I dont think pawn move is the best move.I have figured out last night queen move could be the best.anyways,Lets continue.
Please don't call it "the E8 system." Google E8. E8 is something like 60 times the size of the human genome. It took a team of 18 scientists/mathematician's 4 years to work out the number. And then there's Anthony Garrett Lisi, who discovered correspondences between E8, quantum physics, and general relativity. Google Anthony Garrett Lisi! Anthony Garrett Lisi is an utterly improbable man -- he's straight out of some screenwriter's imagination. ... a straight up genius who lives in a sweet custom van dividing his time between unriddling the mathematical mysteries of the universe and surfing (or snowboarding). Seriously? For real? For real. Anyway, it's really great stuff and I wish I had the mind to appreciate it up close and in detail rather than just from afar in dumb ape slack-jawed fashion... but anyway, this foolery here, with our Chinese tablemaker, if it has anything real to do with E8, any actual basis in 248 dimensional continuous symmetry (!) ... well Streetfighter -- I'll leave these forums, buy me a custom van, and attempt to surf!
My bet is winnersp doesn't know all that much more about E8 than I do.
Remember "The Turk" ...
Call it winnersp's system.
I call it e8 as there are about up to 248 flowing factors to be considered..
king position,last moved piece color,attention to attack or defense*8 tabeles),big piece or pawn move,in which color to move to,different color proporities to move to and guard(3 colors for attack or defense),...thats 2*2*8*2*2*3=384 flowing factors.I just pick the one which fits the most.
it learn from engine analysis,those table are tested in every position by engine analysis when I make them.but I keep the secret how I get them,you get it?
I am expecting you show me more about E8 math beauty with your own explaniations.
"I call it e8 as there are about up to 248 flowing factors to be considered..
king position,last moved piece color,attention to attack or defense*8 tabeles),big piece or pawn move,in which color to move to,different color proporities to move to and guard(3 colors for attack or defense),...thats 2*2*8*2*2*3=384 flowing factors.I just pick the one which fits the most."
That's pathetic. Rick Perry gives uh, uh, uh, better answers. You call it E8 because there are "about up to 248 flowing factors" then you multiply some numbers to 384! Jeezis.
Here's what you need to do:
1. Go back and read in your original post the super genius crap you cut n' pasted from wikipedia about E8.
2. Write one hundred times on the blackboard: I will not pretend to be smart, I will not pretend to be smart...
3. Apologize to Streetfighter for using whatever BULLSH*T you are using to beat him.
4. Apologize to everyone else in the this thread whose time you have wasted with your pitiful drivel.
no logical move in L mode,so M mode applied for when king in left(or in queen side),last moved piece bishop is white color.
by queen moving to e8 a red-figured position,it with the rook guards the whole a8-h8 line for defense.
no rook move as it moves to h6(a big blue-figured position).no bishop move as its logical move to e7 is also a blue-figured position.
I just have one wish-leave my post and find your peace.if you can't,go do something else than reading any info I am posting.
I enjoy better playing with master streetfigher and the result will tell.
my suggestion for you:grow up..or send me a challenge which I will accept or deny depending on your reply.so you better go off now.
why should I give my theory details to you?
Because I think it is nonsense hidden behind ad hominem attacks. But now I have a better question:
Why did you start this thread?
to share what I found new for chess,as to test my system and develop it.
No. He found it on wiki. See the earlier post in this thread where he says so.
You, sir, are a charlatan!
so what's the position look like now? (in ythe game, i mean)
whatever you call it,name it,I invented the charts and I use it.
thats all....the creativity,inspiration,learning process and tests.
the chart to be looked for each move-i posted it already in details.
I invented Wikipedia.
I invented God.
winnersp, how long does it take for you and your system to make a move?
can i become GM in 30 years?
by ShiningLotus a few minutes ago
If chess players are so smart why they are not millionaires/billionaires?
by Talmapai a few minutes ago
by ColonelKnight 2 minutes ago
3/13/2014 - Cold As Ice
by jackbbb 4 minutes ago
Why is LAG so bad a the site the last few days?
by bhenderson001 6 minutes ago
how do i make chess a serious part of my life
by achja 7 minutes ago
Nimzowitsch's Defense answer to d4 d5 Nc3
by bongcloudftw 7 minutes ago
Studying master games?
by baddogno 8 minutes ago
Magnus Carlson : A ruthless Beast
by Noble_Gas 9 minutes ago
The f5 Opening
by falcogrine 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!