4545 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think Go Now is from 1965, when I was a little kid.
go is actually dated back long long time ago when even it was recorded in old ancient books about mysterious animals that do not exist now.Its the variation game of yin and yang.
1965?? Seriously, spuds, you can be so dense sometimes...
This is starting to sound like synesthesia.
this whole program was never based on programming.I dont think such programming tool exist to deal with so many things together at the moment in my way.Its said chess will be completely solved in like 50 years for computers though.
It is all about human intelligence.They are all logic,color,space imagination,number indication and connection,visual thinking and could be Synesthesia.
winnersp, maybe you should consider combining some of the ideas you've discussed in even more creative ways. You've recently mentioned mushrooms and music. Maybe your engine program could display little 3-D singing mushrooms that sing happy songs when you're winning.
yes,this is more technical.I want to animate the whole chess game to watch like a movie. your idea could be fun is creative too.when one side win,the mushrooms jump and sing together.
if insect design is playable,I could develop another kind,for example,human figures,and u can think pieces are those people in ur life and how they mind fight each other and make choices for life. also interesting and help decision making for life.？
omg,I think this idea is so creative! for chess 3d play advertisement,a nominated work.
asgrapheme-color synesthesia. . For example, an ambiguous stimulus '5' that can be interpreted either as 'S' or '5' will have the color associated with 'S' or with '5', depending on the context in which it is presented. If presented among numbers, it will be interpreted as '5' and will associate the respective color. If presented among letters, it will be interpreted as 'S' and will associate the respective synesthetic color. -from wiki
like the Twilight Zone huh ?
Whoa! I think I heard Old Scratch, himself, in this!
... and I think I saw his face in that last diagram, on the right...
I take this for centipedes design.
the chessboard effect sample is here
ok,finally a clear description for the table explaniation.
Each two colors will be added to each position for players to view all board.There are total 6 colors to achieve trippy effect.So soon we can play 3d chess like in star trek.
But this one is more complicated,as you actually play 8×8 chessboard in 6 levels for only one move.The whole game you check different 3 tables for both attack and defense, （The table combination is fixed already myself）,and since the logic requires that any two out of three tables under either attack or defense shall meet the logic for position calculation that in attack mode, you make higest valued move and in defense mode you make lowest valued move,there are 2×3=6 tables to check for one move.6 tables for 6 different chessboards.less perspective or tables you check,less information you have for the full complete future status,and when you check them all,you have a very clear idea of what possible future is like,then you can choose to develop your situation in the best way.you can choose to play different style by chcking only attack or defense tables,or checking fewer tables,even checking opposite tables,that decide the style of your play.of course,the highest strength is the one you check them all.But it would be interesting to see what the future would be like if you purposely check less tables and make things worse.For example,when you check too many attack tables where you are supposed to check defense tables as it fits the logic,your chess game would be over defended and thus become a closed game with some hole to be cracked by strong engines.And when you check too many defense tables where you are supposed to check attack tables,you will miss the chance to gain advantage and space thus the game is wide open and quickly turn into end game where you have disgusing pawn shapes or weird king positions,etc.This has something to do with the art of war,the attack and defense balance.
When the position color of ur opponent last moved piece and the your or ur opponent king position either on kingside or queenside considered,There would be altogether 6×2×4=48 tables for each side,and 96 tables for both sides..black and white.It works for Fisher random chess and shuffle chess as well.
It is logic as in our three demensions,any object has 6 perspectives,plus time affair ,96 perspectives deivdes time into 16 partial space. So the whole design is like a time stilled space of 4th demension! I am not guaranteed to ensure the space structure is 100% correct,perhaps just a fuzzy imagine of the 4th demension. but as long as it works for chess,it get the potenial to become developed.
The three dimensional board consists of seven different levels. Three of these have size four by four, and have a fixed position; the four others have size two by two and can be moved by the players. The position of the fixed levels looks like a staircase: each next level starts above the third row of the previous level, while the other sides of all fixed levels are parallel. The movable levels find themselves initially above the outermost corners of the upper and lower level; i.e., one of its corner has a corner of the board below it, while the other three corners have no fixed level board below it.
I am not good at stereograms.Maybe someone can tell whats in this pic...a face
anyway,the 3d chess is supposed to develop visual thinking and 3d concept thinking other than and 3d stereogram.
Definitely not the face. It looks like a chunk of something - not quite a dog turd, but maybe a moldy sandwich. On second thought, it might be Homer Simpson wearing a fright wig.
it is a brick face.see http://www.netaxs.com/~mhmyers/rdsjpgs/brickface.jpg.
It's very difficult to discern. The hair (I assume that's the hair) is disproportionately large and the features of the face are difficult to make out because everythings constructed out of bricks.
Doesn't work for color blind folks. It's just bricks to them, and me.
Mysterious Mate in 2
by Mr_Grizzly a few minutes ago
Why does White move first in chess ?
by HattrickStinkyduiker a few minutes ago
Caro-Kann: Panov-Botvinnik as Black
by BillyCpresesnts 2 minutes ago
My "new" openings
by honeybadJR 4 minutes ago
Is the Caro-Kann the opening I was searching for or should I go for 1...e5 ?
by ozzie_c_cobblepot 8 minutes ago
Chess rating system
by AlCzervik 14 minutes ago
12/9/2013 - Mate in 3
by romanrapido 14 minutes ago
Chess Sacrifice. ...??
by sammynouri 17 minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by fabelhaft 19 minutes ago
by MHR84 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!