13405 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
in other recent news:man walks on moon
That's one of the dumbest games I ever saw.
agreed why didn't Nakamura just beat him? promote a queen or two and that is game. how much time did he have?
Iam not showing you my knowledge of setting but Iam showing you how to set your program to beat a strong Grandmaster, in chess.Lets face it people, We all loss to the supercomputer and there is no stopping that.remember we are the one who teach them chess we program them to play chess so therefore the program we built will beat us 100% in any game. Let Nakamura and Carlsen play Deep Rybka 5 Cluster lets see who will win.I guarantee the Rybka Cluster will 100 percent beat them both.Ok example we have a student that we are teaching in chess ,and everyday he plays us, Do you really think that our student would not beat us, Sure a hundred percent he will soon beat us,That is the same thing Programing a supercomputer to play a super strong chess against us.The only reason why Nakamura beats Rybka in that time he purchased the program and he study it everyday notice he knows how to play it good from the beginning.same things as as Kramnik against Deep Fritz but then they made a new version of it then Deep Fritz 10 beat Kramnik,very simple logic see first then, Study your opponent, then you will 100 percent beat him.Now let them play the new version now of Deep Hiarcs 14 ,Houdini 4 Pro, Strelka 5.7 version and Stockfish 130907 Robodini 1.1 Critter 1.6a RobboLito 0.21 Vitruvius 1.19 Fire 2.2 Extreme Lets see who will win and run it on its Cluster I guarantee that those Program will crushed all of them both easy.
personally i don't care if computers can beat anything. Really just forget the computers and play with people although computers are nice for analysing
It seems that someone worships the computers and has contempt for the world's greatest human chess players. Perhaps that is due to his 1063 rating in Online Chess.
In the end, this game showed the brilliance and creativity of Nakamura. He willingly gave up two exchange sacs. He was even able to embarrass Rybka, by underpromoting so many times.
I really like this "system"; I wonder if it is played at master level?
by btickler a few minutes ago
Should we only target paid chess.com members to be our students?
by tigerprowl 3 minutes ago
by melvinbluestone 3 minutes ago
Online Chess Etiquette
by markwasserberg 4 minutes ago
What's the quickest way to get a title?
by hakim2005 11 minutes ago
World Chess Champion Magnus Carlsen says I fear nobody....
by shemim_hanif 12 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Somebodysson 13 minutes ago
Selling some chess books on ebay, ends today!
by theowls 13 minutes ago
12/10/2013 - Easterwood-Williams 2004
by Arad1376 17 minutes ago
Daily Puzzle 12/9/13-No topic!!
by quietvolcano 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!