18698 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
But this last candidates tournament had a terrible format, it was all about blitz, so it's not really a legitimate world championship match in my view. FIDE really failed badly.
Second off, in more modern times, when Karpov got his title does anybody seriously believe that he could have beaten Fischer?
Fischer hadn't played any tournaments for three years, so by 1975, I think he seriously could have lost against Karpov.
Interestingly enough, he was preparing though. The same person that created Fischer's "Big Red Book" of Spassky's games, also created a similar book for Fischer of Karpov's games.
Roger Maris wasn't even the home run king on his own team (that would be The Mick).
Nope. Mantle never held the single season home run record. Ever...not even for a day.
Man! no wonder poor Roger lost his hair. I'd have bolted for St. Louis too had I played for a team whose fans had no appreciation for my accomplishments.
So what if Fischer hadn't played in a few years? How long did Kamsky take off from playing chess and is he any worse now for it? It's not like he forgot anything (Fischer remembered everything...). I've taken years off from playing chess. It takes a few weeks to get things back together but that's all. It's not like running or something where you get fat..
Actually, yes, Kamsky is worse. He is certainly past his peak.
It's interesting that people who continue to be apologists for Fisher never seem to bring up the fact that Fisher had every opportunity in the world to play a match with Karpov, and he declined. Why was that? More gamesmanship? Self-doubt, perhaps? Lina Grummett once said that FIsher told her, "I've been thinking... ('And then I knew it was all over' - Lina), I really don't want to risk losing my title". If Fisher wasn't certain he could defeat Karpov, why are others so sure that he could?
LOL. Could you be any more condescending? But you're right. It's not possible to have any rational discussions wih you.
Fischer was psychologically terrified of losing games and even worse when it came to losing his title. That being said he would probably have beaten Karpov.
10/6/2015 - No Interest In Her
by oscarhoppen a few minutes ago
Record against particular opponent
by Sluggos 2 minutes ago
Cheapos in Chess
by thatwhichpasses 2 minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 2!!
by aww-rats 5 minutes ago
Something to play as black
by ThrillerFan 6 minutes ago
The King Hunt. Best 3 min game ever?
by mcmodern 12 minutes ago
unfair play warning - for not accepting rematch
by trysts 22 minutes ago
Time to Laugh! Fun TROLL games with Robert0905!
by Robert0905 22 minutes ago
by incantevoleutopia 26 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by Dadg777 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!