14294 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think a game needs to be four moves to count toward ratings on this site - it's in a FAQ somewhere.
Check out post #11 here:
Yes, three or less moves, and it's considered unrated.
If you win a game in exactly four moves or more, you get rating points.
So that means you cannot really put the Fool's Mate to use..
Also means you can resign if you blunder on move 3
After White moves 4, the rating adjustments will take place
Thank-you to Metastable, StrategicPlay, madhacker and Hydra for your speedy responses. Now I understand. BE warned I may challenge for a game.
Respect! Andy F a.k.a. Aventurine & InvidiousAtheist
Hi there, I did search the forum but found no answer. I was wondering why when I was 1146 and I played a game against someone 1134, won on time after 3 moves I received no points for this win. I presume a certain number of moves must be made. Is this correct and if so, how many?
Thanks in advance for an explanation.
No rating change on a timeout until three and a half moves or seven ply. Like spitting into the wind when I write this in the forums.
The site help and staff says four moves on a timeout. Resignation on any move affects ratings. http://support.chess.com/Knowledgebase/Article/View/16/0/how-do-ratings-work
My opponent faltered on time and I did not get points. What is even worse opponent did not loose points. At any chess tournament points are given or taken (not given) for failing to show for the game. That must be some new stupid rule or error.
ELO/ECF game assessment software
by hicetnunc a few minutes ago
8/28/2014 - White to Draw
by deepak64 a few minutes ago
how to became GM
by tkbunny a few minutes ago
Best intel processor for chessbase
by DrCheckevertim 3 minutes ago
ADMIN -- Someone deleted the "Egalitarian Troll Society"
by DrCheckevertim 7 minutes ago
what percentage of professional chess players are poor?
by SilentKnighte5 15 minutes ago
En passant in chess.com
by let-see 17 minutes ago
House of Staunton "Classic 3.75"
by Ace_Club 21 minutes ago
Do amateurs spend an inordinate amount of time and energy on chess?
by Till_98 52 minutes ago
Positional (calm) player vs tactical (sharp) one
by bobyyyy 84 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!