18398 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I try to play games according to what I've gleaned is general sound opening theory from books: develop your pieces, link your rooks, no pawn moves without a reason, etc. My frustration, at the 1000 plus or minus range I play in, is how people push immediate attacks, and whether I can refute them or not isn't the issue; it's that I have to refute them at the expense of building a solid foundation. I'm all for initiative in a game, but let a guy tie his shoes, you know?
Or is this what people mean by 'coffeehouse chess'? Does it stop once you've reached a certain level and everone's played through those lines?
Heh, I know what you mean. A guy comes by my club from time to time, and I'm much better than him, but I never get comfortable positions because to punish the wild moves he plays means we enter odd looking unbalanced positions.
Yeah, coffeehouse chess is wild attacks, initiative >> material type of evaluations.
In blitz, if you don't like to be under pressure, a tactic is to play super-defensive, lock everything up, over-defend everything, and play for a win on time never undertaking any active play. Super boring to me but some people specialize in it for blitz :p
If they attack like crazy on the wings you can consider waiting to decide which side you castle on. Also don't lock the center, that way you can counter-punch there where play is more valuable, generally speaking.
If they just attack all around no matter what, focus on development, castling, and all that. I can't say it ends without seeing a game, but there are always aggressive players. If you mean openings with pawn structures all on one color and weird stuff like that, yeah, that does end as you go up.
thanks for the reply, you raised some good points. We're going to dig back in, then, and see how it goes. thanks.
Bob Hope and Bob Fischer
by EscherehcsE a few minutes ago
Spanish Opening: Best books.
by KunleKayode 2 minutes ago
I want to improve should I quit playing blitz?
by AsManThinketh 2 minutes ago
King's Gambit a good opening?
by CAL06Chess 4 minutes ago
practise makes a man perfect
by I_Am_Second 9 minutes ago
What are the similarities and differences between chess and military strategy ?
by baddogno 13 minutes ago
2/27/2015 - Securing The Win
by ali99_98 18 minutes ago
I have 3 million masters' chess games.Can I earn some money by selling it.
by OpiningTheoretician 18 minutes ago
Why is there no take back option?
by Tater1234 21 minutes ago
Chessbazaar's Dubrovnik 4" crimson problem?
by FrankHelwig 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!