10812 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't consider a Copyright a monopoly. All writers copyright their pieces. Here is one of mine the is has a copyright symbol © after the title.
Can't wait until someone uses in a book and then I can sue and make some money.
Copyrighting annotations not only makes sense, it's international law.
But that doesn't mean you can't play copyrighted moves, it means you can't claim the annotations as your own.
i read somewhere moves are considered as facts and thus not copyrightable by US law. annotations are of course copyrightable [for instance, some chesspub subscriber analyses].
My chess friend in the USA was telling me that a cypress tree off the coast of California is copyrighted. You can't publish photo's of it etc. I wonder if that is true?
I will copyright the mistakes,so whoever make a mistake on the game of chess has to paid me a royalty I become the richest man of the world
Any attempt to allow copyrighting of chess moves will result in major problems...the individuals who first played e4 and d4 will certainly have a good aguement for royalties. And any game will be owned by two individuals?...what about FIDA who payed them for playing? She will also have a good aguement that the games belong to her. The Broadcasting of Games will also have to consider the Royalties oweing...and decide if it will be financially worthwhile to do so. And what about the situation where more than one individual claims to have first played this move? How do we sort than one out?
Exactly. It's like a sporting event - the owners have the right to the pictures and video, and their "official" commentary, but they have no right of ownership over the events which occur on the field.
Besides, it's ridiculous from a number of directions. No one would pay to view the games of any but the world's best players, so it would do no others any good and serve to depress interest in chess overall. In that respect it is a completely counterproductive idea.
And if you think you "own" the rights to your novelty on move 14 of the Openchensky Variation of the Najdorf Sicilian, should your royalties also be "taxed" to pay the estates of Openchensky and Nadjorf for their contributions? And what of Sicily - you don't want those folks feeling cheated . . .
Another problem with copyrighting is someone could simply generate random move lists (I mean sensible games) using Houdini and claim they're "copyrighted" even though they're unplayed games. Suppose then Carlsen plays a game featuring just those moves.. the original person could then claim copyright and disallow the game's publication.
Also, Kim Kardashian tried to copyright her looks, and make it illegal for anyone to look like her.
This one was settled out of court. In the future, maybe you should get jail time if you look like Kim, or play like Topalov.
It might be equally offensive to look like Topalov or play like Kim!
I think chess is ok until somebody copyrights checkmate.
Copyright infringes upon civil liberties when it inhibits freedom of expression and/or innovation. Which makes me wonder, is it possible to copyright ideas or intangibles? Probably not, you need concrete specifications for a product.
The requirement for dissimilarity for products that serve similar functions to avoid infringement on copyright; I guess that's the key consideration for the courts on a case-by-case basis, although it's somewhat a mystery to me how lawyers are necessarily more qualified to make judgments in fields that they do not necessarily understand as well as the parties that have an interest in the outcome, ultimately somebody has to judge these cases...
"although it's somewhat a mystery to me how lawyers are necessarily more qualified to make judgments in fields that they do not necessarily understand as well as the parties that have an interest in the outcome, ultimately somebody has to judge these cases..."
The point is that lawyers and judges do not pretend to know more about any field...other than law. They plead their aguements on existing law as it relates to the field in question...in this case "property rights".
That's not really a copyright issue though. A football team can expect compensation for playing, so should a chess player. The issue isn't one of copyright, but of compensation for playing. If there's a live broadcast, the players may be entitled to some of the royalties, but that's more of a contract issue.
The London Chess Classic has made arrangements for the players to be involved with the broadcasts. Most tournaments have contracts with their players and the fees for those contracts are often paid in part by broadcasts. It's not about copyrighting moves, but about getting paid to perform.
I could have copyrights in the Grob opening (1-g4) that I mastered very well, but, no, I'm not capitalist... Just look my games, it's free!!!
nobody quote my forum posts. i own the copyrights for them and i will sue!
I laughed out loud!
Since nobody else has done it yet, I am going to claim a copyright on 1.d4. Nobody is allowed from here on out other than me to play 1.d4 or any other combination of moves that directly transpose into a 1.d4 opening!
I take a copyright on winning a game. No one is allowed to win a game of chess or any other type of game or sport unless they pay me.
The domination of the internet in our Society today, will no doubt have the law makers going back to the classroom to deal with a whole new way of doing things, and with it many risks and pitfalls. I believe that it is only a matter of time when "Big Brother" will try to control/police the internet as well.
Tactical/Aggressive response to 1. d4
by TheGrind a few minutes ago
2015 CHESS NEW YEARS RESOLUTIONS OR GOALS
by SocialPanda 9 minutes ago
8/31/2015 - The Hunt
by Paspasuy 10 minutes ago
Who Will Win The 2015 Sinquefield Cup? And who will win Grand Chess Tour.
by NguyenDaiKa 11 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by stuartjohnson26 25 minutes ago
Is KG usuable at my level?
by abrahampenrose 30 minutes ago
100 funny things to do on chess II
by jeffreyni 35 minutes ago
Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!
by Diakonia 36 minutes ago
Good Beginner Opening for black
by abrahampenrose 46 minutes ago
A game with zero mistakes
by matancs92 47 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!