17575 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
He never said you couldn't act like a jerky adult.
I've been told that gratuitous abuse is now known as 'banter'. That definition of 'banter' comes not from the OED -or Webster's or Macquarie or The Collins dictionaries- but from those on-line garbage 'dictionaries' that are steadily eroding meaning.
Either that or they are evolving meaning...depends on your outlook.
And on your dictionary.
I think I know what you mean Andy but I'm not sure evolving is the appropriate word, formed -as it is- from evolution. 'Evolution' -in most cases- refers to a natural, gradual change in response to environmental conditions (yes, genetically also -sometimes- but genetics is of even less relevance here); it is an impersonal process and is therefore undirected. What I was talking about is a -relatively- sudden change in definition, and that requires agency or choice, which is not evoution, it is a decision.Have a look at -say- 'The Urban Dictionary' which 'grades' definitions according to popularity and how funny respondents consider them to be.'Banter' was the word that got me started. Note also the massive list of 'derivatives' inspired by their definition of banter.Of course, I realize this is a work of (supposed) humour. What scares me are not just those who find it a laugh, but those people who already consider it a work of reference.
Bring class to the house.
Bring class to the house.
I have recently begun playing on the live chess site. I'm sure this has been covered many times, but please show some class. If you are lost, resign and say good game. I'm sick of having a won position and then having to wait for minutes after you sign off. We are here to play chess - when you have been outplayed, admit it and resign. Chess shoud be a gentleman's/gentlewoman's game. Act like an adult.
I don't know. I recently played a game where I was winning, but really tired and did lots of blunders especially in the end. The opponent told me I missed a lot of mates, indeed, so if he had resigned as soon as he started losing (having way less material) I would not have been able to analyze my game and see which mates I missed! Some of these, I wouldn't have noticed some even without having been tired, so it was pretty instructing.
Of course, I realize this is a work of (supposed) humour. What scares me are not just those who find it a laugh, but those people who already consider it a work of reference.
Why do the two have to be mutually exclusive?
The two aren't mutually exclusive. I was talking about valuing humour above meaning.
Everybody pay attention to SemanticsBoy!
Well yeah, once you got to work on the case, inspector.
Uncooked birds are totally worthless. These two were hired by the black cat, he should have just eaten them:
Class is saying nothing when one clearly wants to or has something to say that with better thought, may be better left unsaid. Clearly there was no class in initiating this post...
It's funny to find this topic from a player who, after losing to me in a live chess game, sent me a message with title "CHEATER" and accused me of cheating with a rather harsh choise of words. I wrote him back inquiring how he can be sure that I cheat and urged him to report our game to Chess.com for analysis. He never replied. And here the same fellow is bantering about class and gentleman's game.
how much logic was behind tal's sacrafices
by Vortex_Surfer a few minutes ago
why isn't botvinnik talked about as much
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 7 minutes ago
who likes who in staafff the most staff the ko
by Fresh_from_the_Oven 7 minutes ago
11/28/2014 - Inch By Inch
by marsuplami 8 minutes ago
by pfren 8 minutes ago
A not-so-simple mate in 2
by chaotic_iak 8 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by Elubas 11 minutes ago
Nakamura explains chess
by Addicted-to-Chess97 11 minutes ago
Carlsen's next opponent in the WCC match
by CrazyJae 13 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by Ziryab 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!