15956 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
You give hardly any analysis
The computer doesn't seem to like your refutation... then the analysis goes deeper...
DefinitelyNotGM Yes, I agree a few games I won do not refute anything.
For Ponziani fans [and I am one of them][ what does this mean for the Ponziani? It really means very little! Why?
Because this is an extremely complicated variation which you will rarely see Black use. For Black to use this variation he must study for days the several White replies. With this experiment we are discovering the best and worse Black replies?
A competent Ponziani player or vote chess team will know this line and be ready for it!
I know I hardly gave any analysis. These variations are very complicated and I will leave them at this point for others to analyze. And it is true in the game vs Expertise the chess engines give Black the advantage. However studying it more it seems to come out to an even game.
This Fraser variation is simply too complicated to post a good analysis but anyone is free to comment on the 6 games completed.
I will note that the game with 1 random ended in a very unusual endgame which could be fun for some to analyze.
Yeah...sorry about my game...I was without access to my engine for a bit, and thus managed to completely screw myself over
The Fraser variation is so complicated that you need a chess engine at first.
[assuming it is allowed.]
Here is the basic position and I the results of these 7 games per White's chosen 12th move [which is critical]
ponz11 are you running from me. Come play live chess
He is a far stronger player than you, chill out.
Results per 12th move choice:
12. Qa6? Black won all three games 0-3
12. Qd5 One draw and one win for Black 1/2 -1 1/2
13. Na3! game vs 1 random drawn 1/2 - 1/2
Also, in one game White tried 7. Ke2 Bb6 8. Be3 ?! and Black won 0-1
Conclusion: 12. Qa6? pretty much refuted
12. Qd5 needs more investigation [but I do not think it is the best,correct move]
12. Na3! the "1 Random Variation" [note this may already have a name but I call it the "1 Random Variation"] This variation is very interesting and needs more investigation. The actual final position was a very unusual draw endgame.
Thanks to the 5 players who participated in my "refutation"
My Verdict: "Not Refuted!"
Get Free Coaching
by Sexy-Sunshine a few minutes ago
why do some poeple never resiging in online chess?
by cschene 2 minutes ago
Anand will beat Carlsen in 2014
by vidya999 3 minutes ago
Which openings do you recommend for a 5|0 blitz OTB tournament?
by MSC157 3 minutes ago
12/22/2014 - Peter Leko vs Alexander Morozevich, Nice, 2009
by FFOman 3 minutes ago
by Anarchos61 8 minutes ago
If You Could Fix One Thing On Chess.com, What Would It Be?
by Stevie65 10 minutes ago
I was told to forget about studying openings, HELP!
by LongIslandMark 12 minutes ago
Big Glitch in the Tournament
by QueenNeha 14 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by marcio77 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!