8063 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
DonaldLL
Good morning...
I would like to understand better about the difference between an openings book that is suitable for human play compared to a book that is designed for engine vs engine play. Is it that human books only have data gathered from human games and engine books only have data from engine vs engine games? I think not but could someone give me a little more insight as to why or how one book is considered better for human (like Powerbook 2008) and other is better for engine (like Rybka3.ctg). I am not so much interested in the comparison of these 2 specific books but more in theory of the difference between the 2 types
thank you in advance for your assistance
Variable
Well the only thing is that at many? levels of play (and at least the average) human players and computer engines have different strengths and weaknesses. My guess is that most engines are a lot stronger with tactics than us humans are, and they try to use lines to use this to there advantage. Everyone is different and chooses to play different lines for different reasons, but in general I think that is probably the case.
PerfectGent
Obviously these opening books are all used by computers or by humans preparing for humans by using computers for preparation; the "book" is not one made of pages of course. It is well known that there are different books whereby some are more suitable for human use/study and some are more suitable for engine vs engine matches; as such if I am preparing for a human vs human match I would use certain opening books (yes on my computer in preparation). If I am preparing for a match against an engine or engine vs engine then the opening book used for best possible outcome is not the same book... the opening books are different and specific to the purpose or goal. Regardless of the fact that they are checked with an engine, it is this difference that I am interested in understanding. The example I provided is a case in point. Powerbook 2008 is better used for human study and not the best for engine matches. Rybka.ctg or Perfect15.ctg are considered good engine books. Why??
get a rating as low as possible
by Pawnpusher3 a few minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by fabelhaft 4 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by chessgenius2014 4 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer (Time Zone issue)
by AlexNic 7 minutes ago
Scandinavian Defense 2...Qxd5; 3...Qa5: why not 4 Nf3?
by ponz111 13 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by Conquistador 15 minutes ago
games are slow
by ketchuplover 19 minutes ago
My removal from a tournament
by joeydvivre 21 minutes ago
Best computer for chess analysis?
by poet666 24 minutes ago
Why do I mess up in winning positions?
by ketchuplover 27 minutes ago