8180 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
soccerscience24
How many arbiters are suggested for a 100 player chess tournament? Of course the more the better, but what is the minimum that is normally needed to allow the event to run smoothly?
echecs06
One is plenty enough. In OTB tourneys, players are pretty well aware of the rules, litigation is rare and most of the time, easy to resolve. Appeals are well stipulated in the rules and regulations of every serious tourney.
brfc
As an arbiter myself, the one arbiter would be under a ton of pressure to manage 100 people. 2 would be adequate for a congress, and for a rapidplay you'd need 2 good arbiters for them to cope with taking in results and pairing in that short time. Trust me, doing a 70 man rapidplay on your own is a nightmare!!! I've been through it.
In summary, if congress, if you can really only have 1 arbiter, then perhaps you could get away with it. But I would strongly suggest 2.
Also, the players don't know the rules as well as you think! The amount of times people have promoted a pawn incorrectly is amazing, and how many people ask for a 10.2 claim. Makes me shiver inside xD
Im sure that most players who are present are pretty well aware of the rules, but since this particular tournament will be taking place at a university, this will likely be the first tournament for many players which might pose a bit of a challenge at least in the beginning rounds.
Puchiko
Ouch. I'd then recommend one certified main arbiter, and some (2-4) expirienced players to help out both with rulings as well as taking in results, inputting them into a computer, and pairings. And of course, a short clarification of rules before the first round is a must in this case,
Gents, the answers are coming from different perspectives. The OP didn't specify whether he was organizing a FIDE tournament or a USCF tournament, or whether the tourney was rated at all! In USCF, the players call their own flags and there are a few other differences in how the rules are applied. Those specifics determine the best answer among many.
OP, can you clarify?
right, my mistake. this will not be a FIDE or USCF rated tournament (although the standard rapidplay (20min) rules will apply). as for it being rated at all, I believe the particular swiss system program gives an approximate elo range upon the end of the last round.
I think Puchiko has the right ballpark. though to respond to brfc, i may tuck away 10.2 after just reading it :P. thank you everyone for your input
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by indianteacher a few minutes ago
Forgot user name and password.
by htdavidht a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by BotanicalKnight a few minutes ago
get a rating as low as possible
by paulgottlieb 3 minutes ago
Multiple team membership
by knightspawn5 4 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer (Time Zone issue)
by AlexNic 12 minutes ago
Scandinavian Defense 2...Qxd5; 3...Qa5: why not 4 Nf3?
by ponz111 18 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by Conquistador 20 minutes ago
games are slow
by ketchuplover 24 minutes ago
My removal from a tournament
by joeydvivre 26 minutes ago