10977 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@Nimzo - I said to post links in case no one wanted to answer, I guess I wasn't sure if it was a stupid question. When I googled it I got lists of ECO code openings - and still wondered why it stopped at 500. I do alot of research over the net, and have no problems with SE's, try googling: Why does ECO Codes stop at 500 - maybe not for you, but I get absolutely nothing with useful information.
@Shepi- No, Alekhine is the most greatest, awesomest ever!
Alekhine may be the greatest, awesomest ever!, but I believe the question was who is the Bestest Greatestest Most Awesomest ever!?
THe ECO classification is a little cumbersome. Maybe it's time to design something a little more streamlined.
I think F's might be added if some currently unorthodox openings develop enough theory?
Rooperi take another look at what the 'A' codes cover.
What do you propose? A system based upon pawn structure after 6 moves? Numeric hash value based upon the position? Maybe something like soundex but for chess positions, where similarity to other known values determines the number along with a degree of deviation? Anyone have an idea? Nobody likes ECO, but no one has proposed a better system.
Nobody likes ECO, ...
It is clear and logical.
Also, it is comprehensive.
The only classification I can think of with any ambiguity at all is the Catalan (E00 - E09), which is essentially a "D" opening which arises normally out of the 1 ...Nf6 & 2 ...e6 move order. But wherever it was placed would be a bit out of place.
I think it would be better to classify openings based on their inherent pawn structure. I think it would make it easier to learn new openings.
Chess is a search for truth, not a quest for helping beginners. The ECO system, as designed, facilitates the search for truth.
by LazyChessPlayer3201 a few minutes ago
White to move wins (Difficult)
by LazyChessPlayer3201 12 minutes ago
Adding weight to pieces
by Mersaphe 17 minutes ago
How strong tactically should I be before concentrating on openings / plans?
by Indirect 20 minutes ago
How can I beat computer3-hard
by CrazyJae 21 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by Elubas 28 minutes ago
Carlsen's next opponent in the WCC match
by arul_kumar 32 minutes ago
Playing well or just a bad game for the opponent?
by CrazyJae 41 minutes ago
Chess = calculation
by Mersaphe 42 minutes ago
wrong winner in team match
by Crazychessplaya 43 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!