11050 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Does anybody out there beieve that the first 5 games you play at chess.com plays a huge part on what your rating will be?
[the] first 5 games will pretty much decide how hard improving your rating will be.
Are two different ideas.
1) Yes, and it makes sense because with everyone starting at 1200 you'd want to have their rating reflect their actual strength as quickly as possible. This way an 800 rated player doesn't have to wait months for an accurate rating, and the same for 1600 strength players etc.
2) No, this makes no sense.
Also,does anyone get the feeling that a lot of times you are really playing the computer despite what the username may say or what avatar they may have? Just wondering.
No, but I get the feeling you may be trolling Will you delete this OP too after a few comments are made?
"Does anybody out there beieve that the first 5 games you play at chess.com plays a huge part on what your rating will be?"
"Also,does anyone get the feeling that a lot of times you are really playing the computer despite what the username may say or what avatar they may have? Just wondering."
Easy tiger! very few are cheating sub 2000 (let alone sub 1400... no one makes software that weak).
Enjoy the site, James.
I've only had "the feeling" of playing an engine once online. It wasn't here though. I was playing an online tourney at fics, 20 min., each side. I had won my first 3 games, and was playing the final to win. After we made our first 5 or 6 moves in a few seconds, my opponent let their clock run down to something like 1min. 45secs., whereas I had more than 19 min. left. Some of the most bizarre moves followed by my opponent, incredibly fast. I mean they were making 10 moves every 5 seconds, and won! It was like four years ago, and I still remember it.
As far as the importance of the first five games here? Nah. After a hundred games, the rating seems right.
10/20/2014 - Anand - Radjabov, Linares 2009 Analysis
by BryanCFB a few minutes ago
Free Will vs. Determinism in Chess
by BlackLeopard-1 a few minutes ago
Kings Indian Defense
by XPLAYERJX 3 minutes ago
My Best Games
by Meet_Your_Sensei 4 minutes ago
What strange chess rules can you think up?
by Ironman111 8 minutes ago
If the chance to face Magnus Carlsen 10 times within a year came up....
by SilentKnighte5 16 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by billwall 22 minutes ago
My new travel chess set
by Chicken_Monster 24 minutes ago
HOS Dubrovnik Warning
by FirebrandX 30 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by SilentKnighte5 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!