17929 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Good - as improving one's rating is something to aim for and gives you an idea where you and your opponent are chess playing ability wise.
Bad - as it can pander to pride, foster fear and is can be an unnecessary distraction.
Ratings more often than not do reflect a player’s ability but never be deceived – "good" players can disappoint and "weak" players can astound.
While I am inclined to afford higher rated players more respect when playing than lower ones, I have learnt it is often better to play everyone with equal respect and play each move on merit.
My own rating has steadily gone up since I started playing a year ago but not by so much that I can be carried away or would dare place myself among the chess playing elite.
Of the 10% of games I have won because my opponent has timed out, the net affect on my rating has been for it to slightly increase overall – this helps put things into perspective.
Ratings can be useful when the idea is to facilitate balanced games in team matches and tournaments.
I’m sure other chess.com members have other views and perspectives – it would be nice to read them!
I really like Dan Heisman's suggestion that ratings be kept by federations for internal tracking, but that class norms be the only publically visible indicator for individual ratings. This is actually a really great idea in my mind as it has very few drawbacks, and really serves to address the negatives that are created by people trying to protect their ratings.
Chess and Math
by Earth64 a few minutes ago
Best Chess.com members.
by cheeky_chicky a few minutes ago
How well or poorly does live chess standard correspond with USCF ratings?
by Username333 a few minutes ago
Why did Fischer condemn 1. d4 ?
by Username333 9 minutes ago
Free Game Analysis
by Kebay 10 minutes ago
Help! I feel like I had a strong start but just didn't know where to take it.
by tommasovitch 11 minutes ago
Please ban users that post before Daily Puzzle
by Pulpofeira 11 minutes ago
Can anyone defeat me?
by YoungPatzer 12 minutes ago
why is ruy lopez considered the strongest
by zborg 14 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by yureesystem 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!