11629 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
AndyClifton
I don't know whether I agree with that. Sometimes taking that pressure off yourself is the best thing you can do to improve.
nameno1had
I think at some point, we all hit a wall in terms of ability to calculate the possibilities for positions in our games, as well as, for how many positions we can remember, how to properly deal with. Regardless of whether you have any other outside distractions, eventually, it stands to reason, regardless of how much we try, we have a ceiling that varies per individual.
I wouldn't put a rating number on it though. I would say, many people who could have gone higher, either couldn't or wouldn't, put forth effort regardless of the reason(s).
zborg
The next question is: how do you reignite the passion? I guess a full break will do the job
Couples therapy usually works. You and Caissa. You'll probably get a discount too.
They usually charge less for the pieces in therapy.
"Underachiever" is one of those mush-mouthed words that don't really mean much of anything anyway.
Underachiever, 2 percent-er, Parham player. They all run together.
Just don't fall in with the wrong crowd.
Vivinski
The fact that it's a super hard game. I don't think I underachieve that much
TheGrobe
Nameno1had -- I think your right about the limits on our ability to calculate, but I also think that the key is not to overcome them, but to find a way around them. Unfortunately, I suspect that one of the main keys to this is immersing yourself so thoroughly and lengthily in chess so that you develop an almost innate sense of how to proceed in a given position with minimal calculation due to having previously seen similar motifs.
In effect, while I tend to agree about the limits on our calculation capacity, I'm not convinced about the suggestion that there's a similar limit on our memory, and in fact, I suspect that the latter is the key to getting around the former.
I think regardless of whether you or I am more correct about the issue of memory as it applies generally, I can speak from experience that even after seeing the same puzzle 4 times, I still might only remember seeing it and have to recalculate it.
I'll admit knowing the strategy for openings, middle and endgame themes in general, can help reduce our need to calculate, but for me, that is quite a bit to remember. I think had I put forth the effort I do now, 20 or more years ago, it wouldn't be so bad for me in particular.
6/19/2013 - Short and Sweet
by Ed_Seedhouse 2 minutes ago
4 Pawns vs Rook.
by sylensorr666 4 minutes ago
My debut game
by ylelleh 4 minutes ago
Well annotated (from a strategic perspective) Car Kann, London, Slav games.
by MrDamonSmith 4 minutes ago
YouTube Tryouts!
by Bobbylow 4 minutes ago
Chess Puzzle I Composed
by Firestopr 5 minutes ago
Benoni question
by Irontiger 5 minutes ago
Live chess etiquette
by Lagomorph 6 minutes ago
How is this even possible?!?!?! Please, can someone explain this?!
by Brennon_Huff 6 minutes ago
naka is stronger then magnus
by Demolisher95 8 minutes ago