9524 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
It is against the rules to discuss ongoing games.
yes, I am surprise that the mod/staff hasn't lock this thread yet.
I posted my answer in his game's comment section. The OP can see it when the game is over. Seriously, I don't think that there is a need to make such a big fuss when the opponent turn down your offer. It's normal and the opponent doesn't break any rules, regardless how annoying that may be to you and the rest of the world. There are chess rules designed for this.
There are also people who scream about when the opponent doesn't resign in a losing position. It's silly. If you think the position is winning for you, then show it to your opponent. There is no need for name-calling and bashing your opponent in a public forum just because he turns down your offer.
Hankas is not a jerk. He is always polite and friendly. That can't be said of everyone here!
Andy will be jealous ... hehe.
He'll get bored before you do.
"There is no need for name-calling and bashing your opponent in a public forum"
That is a bit unfair. I haven't done either.
Criminy, let the guy play on and try his ideas instead of whining like a child. You are already treading close to the line by posting an ongoing game for comments.
If it's such an easy draw, you shouldn't have any problem drawing it, stop being a crybaby.
20 moves later and he is still shuffling his king around the board.
My polite request has been met with:
"theimpossibleemu: and i dont intend to draw, so you can either resign or we get to see how many moves a game can go. i rooting for 200"
I have now complained to chess.com so lets see what they do
there is nothing they could do, except for the fair play policy will come in when the game is finish.
I can't see their fair play policy having an effect. He's not stalling as such, he's playing moves. How can you prove that he knew he would make no progress?
The fair play policy is more for letting time run out in an impending checkmate position rather than resigning or making your moves.
He just admitted that he is just fooling around.
In a chat message? Can't see that being used as evidence, we will see.
An arbiter could declare the game to be drawn.
Then they would have to for every game someone complains in. Bad precedent.
You have to go for the 50-move rule. Then you can just block the loser.
or the 3 fold repetition, that could have happen aged ago ?
1. You really shouldn't be discussing a game that's in progress
2. Sometimes it's your job to draw the draw, even if it takes 200 moves
"Melik and Me with GM Melik Khachiyan and BrotherJosh!"
When is it worthwhile to become a chess master?
by paulgottlieb a few minutes ago
Best iPhone Chess Apps?
by kinderchocolate 3 minutes ago
I began to loathe Chess 960 ...
by TheBigDecline 4 minutes ago
Our Prophylactic Move to keep kohai @ Chess.com little longer !
by LegoPirateSenior 5 minutes ago
Traxler thread, what happened to it?
by Mainline_Novelty 9 minutes ago
Systems for Black?
by Mainline_Novelty 10 minutes ago
What happened to Josh Waitzkin?
by Allegretta 11 minutes ago
What are your chess-related goals for 2013?
by Fear_ItseIf 16 minutes ago
Concerned about trolling, again
by SPARTANEMESIS 23 minutes ago
5/23/2013 - The Long Road Home
by andrewchen7 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com