10964 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think it's an interesting question. Haven't seen any study ... an idea for chess.com. Would be a useful guide to planning, if a gen. trend appeared.
I know this thread is old, but it's an interesting one. I'm not a software guy, but I wonder if a chess.com API exists, and whether it can be used to do this kind of statistical analysis. Or perhaps an API isn't needed, just someone that knows how to create a bot that scrubs the site for the needed data.
In any case, I think chess.com should definitely start a stats blog. It would be very interesting.
In otb games it does make a difference, as the average ratings of players who play more games at slow time limits is higher than folk who play less games.
There is/was a graph showing all the data on the English Grading site.
They use a different rating system call grading which has only 3 figures.
But you can convert the numbers approx.
Involving OTB long games, we can look the number of games of the top players have played. Carlsen had approximately played 300 fide long games from 2000 to 2500, 300 more games to reach 2700, and 200 games to reach 2800. Then :
When 2000-2500, 1 game = + 1.7 Elo point
When 2500-2700, 1 game = + 0.7 Elo point
When 2700-2800, 1 game = + 0.5 Elo point
For one of the most rapidly improving players ever anyway.
Carlsen had approximately played 300 fide long games from 2000 to 2500, 300 more games to reach 2700, and 200 games to reach 2800.
True. If we look at Aronian's rating : 600 games from 2600 to 2800. Then : 1 game = 0.3 Elo point for him (half of Carlsen's progression speed, and he's the second best player in the world).
About Caruana and Karyakin (number 5 and number 9 in the world), 400 games from 2500 to 2700, then :
1 game = + 0.5 Elo point.
About Nakamura, 500 games from 2500 to 2700, then :
1 game = + 0.4 Elo point.
How do normal people become 2100 players
by pawnwhacker 7 minutes ago
Too many games
by pawnwhacker 11 minutes ago
Short pre-set times + extra seconds
by el_gato 12 minutes ago
How to Learn Chess
by cdowis75 15 minutes ago
Who's your fav in the Top Ten?
by Fixing_A_Hole 20 minutes ago
Kings Indian Defense
by cdowis75 25 minutes ago
by Pawn_King_2 33 minutes ago
Worst sportsmanship I've ever come across..
by cornbeefhashvili 36 minutes ago
My standard rating only went up 200 points instead of 400?????
by trotters64 45 minutes ago
Who is good at the Ruy Lopez?
by BlackChrysler57 50 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!