16365 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
It seems like black and white would be much more equal if the starting two square pawn advance option was removed from the game. If White wants to play the equivalent of e4, it takes him two moves to do so, and black can now play two development moves in exchange for white's control of the center as compensation. Has this ever been considered before?
What's wrong with how pawns move now? Why is slowing down the game better?
You'll have to answer those questions for anyone to even entertain the idea.
Actually, for hundreds of years, pawns could only move one square. Several hundred years ago they added the "2 squares on the first move" rule so the pawns could get into the game faster, since it was thought it took to long for the battle to start. If you want to get center control as black, just play 1...e5 or 1...c5 in response to e4.
The problem is that White starts with an advantage due to the way pawns move now: "Statistical analysis shows that White scores between 52 and 56 percent at most levels of play, with White's margin increasing as the standard of play improves."
I realize there are things black can do, but that doesn't chane the fact that at very high levels of play white generally plays for a win, and black for a draw, simply because white starts out with a slight tempo advantage. Allowing double pawn moves exacerbates this advantage. I know it would slow the game down a bit, but it seems to me that game balance should take precedence over a slight speed improvement.
Dude, black can move pawns two squares also. Taking away that option for both sides would result in the same exact thing. White will always be slightly better than Black unless you give black some unfair advantage (a special move that white can't do, an extra piece, etc.) Someone has to go first.
Using an analysis board during turn-based games: good or bad?
by PossibleOatmeal a few minutes ago
9/3/2015 - Keres - Petrosian
by maacos 4 minutes ago
How could've white took advantage of my horrible opening?
by Dead_Assassin 7 minutes ago
Should I resign here? Or does black has resources to save the game?
by KeyserSzoze 11 minutes ago
ChessTV - It's Happening!
by zealandzen 30 minutes ago
Chess games of Robert James Fischer
by watcha 34 minutes ago
My Official Staunton 1851 Reproduction Review
by cgrau 41 minutes ago
How'd you great chess players get so great?
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 54 minutes ago
Doubt On the Use of Computers
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 58 minutes ago
by eastyz 63 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!