10353 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Wasn't Tal considered a Romantic? He sacrificed all kinds of pieces and pawns...and became World Champion for his efforts.
I would tend to classify him as such.... maybe he was a Modern Romantic, if such a thing exists. Shirov might fall into a similar category as might Michael Basman or Alexei Federov.
I published an blog article on Tony Santasiere, in case anyone might be interested.
Tal was like a war general who -to his enemy's horror- brutally decapitated the head of his own trusted liutenant before charging forward. Fighting against an experienced general is one thing. Fighting against a mad man is another thing. Tal was a mad man.
Please! Tal loved sacrifices and he loved to hear the spectators gasp, but was also capable of winning delicate endgames and intricate positional squeezes. I believe he holds the record for the longest undefeated streak in modern chess history; hardly the work of a mad man
He actually holds the records for the TWO longest undefeated streaks in GM chess, 95 and 86 games, respectively, both with a span of just over two years in the '70s, which is much more impressive than Capablanca's eight years without a loss because Tal was not only more active but faced overall stronger opposition.
Had he not been plagued by the kidney ailments which he battled for 30 years and eventually took his life, it is hard to say what he might have achieved.
Tal changed his style around 1972. He became a safer player as evidenced by the undefeated streaks mentioned by Estragon. Of course he was still capable of fantastic sacrifices, but older Tal was different from younger Tal.
The very same is true for forever second Paul Keres. His young games contain full of energy and attacking style. Older Keres was just the opposite.
It seems that hypothesis is correct at first look. But where will we put David Bronstein, Efim Geller and few others?
You guys seemed to have forgotten about Charousek and Stein.
can magnus carlson cross the 3000 elo barrier
by Herebrocker a few minutes ago
8/3/2015 - Lure And Catch
by PuzzlePlayer a few minutes ago
In The Doldrums -- Again ?
by RonaldJosephCote 6 minutes ago
Will you become a CM ? ( or a NM, or a IM etc )
by cabadenwurt 21 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal Top Non-World Champions
by Monarch1066 23 minutes ago
how exactly does the castling work?
by stuzzicadenti 25 minutes ago
Does anyone want free chess coaching?!!
by macer75 26 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by UpcountryRain 32 minutes ago
1001-2000 worst things to do while playing chess
by luke623 33 minutes ago
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5? (4.dxe5 d4 5.Ne4 Qa5+)
by pfren 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!