Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

ROOKS ARE AWSOME!!


  • 13 months ago · Quote · #1

    VULPES_VULPES

    ROOKS ARE AWESOME!!

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #2

    Scottrf

    Yeah, they're pretty good.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #3

    CzarKasTicDUDE

    PRAWN$ & KROOK$ ENDGAME STUDYMoney mouth

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #4

    VULPES_VULPES

    Please be relevant, helpful, and nice!

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #5

    VULPES_VULPES

    Who are you talking to?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #6

    Metastable

    Mmmm... slow roasted with lots of spices. Gotta love rooks.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #7

    waffllemaster

    So here's the question, If the OP isn't relevant or helpful with their topic, do the posters have to be?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #8

    VULPES_VULPES

    What's wrong with roasted pawns on a skewer? I eat that for breakfast.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #9

    IrrationalTiger

    "ROOKS ARE AWESOME!!"

    "Please be relevant, helpful, and nice!"

     

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #10

    VULPES_VULPES

    snakesbelly wrote:

    waffllemaster wrote:

    So here's the question, If the OP isn't relevant or helpful with their topic, do the posters have to be?

     

    And can we talk about chicks on here? I mean if we can talk about cooking then I think I should be able to talk about red heads? Just thought

    Hey, you said those things yourself.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #11

    VULPES_VULPES

    You yourself said "redhead" and "chick" and all that stuff (well almost all).

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #12

    bobbyDK

    rooks are sure awesome if you understand to use them correct and follow all rook rules and guidelines.
    rooks belongs on open files and so on.
    to master rooks is a subject of it own.

    Roman made a video on following the guidelines of rook endings. 
    http://www.chess.com/video/player/following-general-principles-of-rook-endgames

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #13

    VULPES_VULPES

    snakesbelly wrote:

    Hey Bobby ,how's things ?

    I saw you trying to start a revolution on chess.com. 

    Any reason why? Boredom?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #14

    VULPES_VULPES

    No, I mean your forum "How Chess Must Change-You're the Voice".

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #15

    VULPES_VULPES

    Hey! Answer my question!

    And chrisr2212, what the fufarquhar are you doing?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #16

    netzach

    Awesome is ''incorrect'' & vulgar-english. This must never be applied to the Royal Game of Chess, nor the pieces, lest it through association cheapens or trvialises it ?

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #17

    VULPES_VULPES

    netzach wrote:

    Awesome is ''incorrect'' & vulgar-english. This must never be applied to the Royal Game of Chess, nor the pieces, lest it through association cheapens or trvialises it ?

    That's true. Sorry Embarassed.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #18

    netzach

    It is a term used by the young & uneducated along with OMG, watever, or nuffin. This is often outgrown once teenagers grow up & begin applying the term '' awesome '' instead to music or chicks...

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #19

    VULPES_VULPES

    snakesbelly wrote:

    Yeah man rooks are awesome OK? Didn't realize it was a question . Sorry.

    Please refer to post #20 and #22.

  • 13 months ago · Quote · #20

    VULPES_VULPES

    snakesbelly wrote:

    OK ...I did....rooks are still awesome OK?

    Yup.

    But you still didn't answer my question.


Back to Top

Post your reply: