13876 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I feel like chess would be more popular if a higher percentage of games were decisive (not drawn). Any ideas of a minor tweak to the rules that might reduce the number of draws?
Here's mine: Starting at move 40, pawns are allowed to move laterally (along a rank), one square at a time (normal pawn moves are still permitted as well). But they are not allowed to capture laterally (just like they can move forward, but can't capture forward).
Some high level FIDE tnmts have recently adopted a rule in which you get 1 pt for a draw and 3 pts for a win.
Joe, nothing personal but don't hold your breath waiting for your rule to be adopted. Check out this link for more info on reducing draws:
you aren't going to get many supporters for that rule nobody wants to throw away all their endgame knowledge. me included
I know, I know. It was more of a hypothetical musing than a proposal for an actual rule change.
There's also "sofia rules" but that wasn't popular when Topalov called for it's use.
Sofa rules? that sounds interesting.
The chess set is placed in the middle of the room.
Why do you want to reduce draws? They're part of the game, and the fact that there is a large percentage of draws at higher levels is a sign that they are playing near-perfectly. Some people say that draws are boring, but 1. not all draws are boring, and 2. the end result of a game -- 1-0, 0-1 or 1/2-1/2 -- is what matters, not whether or not it is interesting.
What's the quickest way to get a title?
by Diamantje a few minutes ago
Playing like an idiot and still winning
by PaullHutchh 5 minutes ago
12/10/2013 - Easterwood-Williams 2004
by Joshcai 6 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by taffy76 7 minutes ago
Predictions: How Long Will He be Champ?
by Conflagration_Planet 11 minutes ago
Chess Is Garbage, Here Are My Own Openings
by MoonDice 12 minutes ago
Borislav Ivanov v Daniel H Campora - Stockfish has a Look!
by 9kick9 13 minutes ago
by InTheBalance 14 minutes ago
New group for Alekhine lovers
by puiuus 16 minutes ago
QGA - Hang on to the pawn?
by Unmaster 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!