Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Rule change to reduce draws?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1


    I feel like chess would be more popular if a higher percentage of games were decisive (not drawn).  Any ideas of a minor tweak to the rules that might reduce the number of draws?

    Here's mine:  Starting at move 40, pawns are allowed to move laterally (along a rank), one square at a time (normal pawn moves are still permitted as well).  But they are not allowed to capture laterally (just like they can move forward, but can't capture forward).

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2


    Some high level FIDE tnmts have recently adopted a rule in which you get 1 pt for a draw and 3 pts for a win.

    Joe, nothing personal but don't hold your breath waiting for your rule to be adopted. Check out this link for more info on reducing draws:


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3


    you aren't going to get many supporters for that rule nobody wants to throw away all their endgame knowledge. me included

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4


    I know, I know.  It was more of a hypothetical musing than a proposal for an actual rule change.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5


    There's also "sofia rules" but that wasn't popular when Topalov called for it's use.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #6


    Sofa rules? that sounds interesting.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #7


    The chess set is placed in the middle of the room.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #8


    Why do you want to reduce draws? They're part of the game, and the fact that there is a large percentage of draws at higher levels is a sign that they are playing near-perfectly. Some people say that draws are boring, but 1. not all draws are boring, and 2. the end result of a game -- 1-0, 0-1 or 1/2-1/2 -- is what matters, not whether or not it is interesting.

Back to Top

Post your reply: