Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Should chess become law?


  • 23 months ago · Quote · #1

    chesspunk04

    Should the teaching of chess become compulsory, because of its educational benefits?

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #2

    trysts

    They already tried it with pac-manLaughing

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #3

    Conflagration_Planet

    Where would they find all the chess teachers?

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #4

    Eberulf

    Why would anyone just assume that chess has any educational benefits - that's the real question. Unless you could produce some study showing quantitative results, as to grades, standardized tests, etc before and after a chess curriculum, why would you just think that somehow, chess has to be some sort of cure-all in education.  But the fact that so many chess players just assume by default it must somehow have these benefits, is itself a correlation I think between chess enthusiasm and lack of general analytical abilities.

    Of course that doesn't mean chess shouldn't be in schools - in the states anyway there are extracurriculur clubs for all sorts of things.

    ----------------

    And also, at the chess tournaments I've been to, there's always been a lot of bearded, scraggly-looking people wandering about with a vacant look in their eye, but also they're really good at chess.  Don't exactly seem to be high-functioning generally though.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #5

    trysts

    Two people whose school made it law to teach pac-man...

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #6

    chesspunk04

    Why assume that a diet of junk food is bad for you?

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #7

    oinquarki

    It's been proven that shogi has even more educational benefits than chess. So do checkers and Monopoly. I think that these clearly useful activities should be forced upon every student because they will teach them so well. If we can get enough educational games into the curriculum, students won't even have to take math, language, history, or science classes because the educational value of shogi will make them automatically know it.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #8

    oinquarki

    trysts wrote:

    Two people whose school made it law to teach pac-man...

     


    My favorite part is the Starbucks.

    At first I had a nagging suspicion that it might be for real, but then I saw the Starbucks -  that's just overkill.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #9

    Eberulf

    #5 I thought those two girl's candor was really refreshing - also their hotness.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #10

    trysts

    oinquarki wrote:
    trysts wrote:

    Two people whose school made it law to teach pac-man...

     


    My favorite part is the Starbucks.


    Yeah, really. Those two are a good excuse for mandatory sterilization.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #11

    chesspunk04

    oinquarki wrote:

    It's been proven that shogi has even more educational benefits than chess. So do checkers and Monopoly. I think that these clearly useful activities should be forced upon every student because they will teach them so well. If we can get enough educational games into the curriculum, students won't even have to take math, language, history, or science classes because the educational value of shogi will make them automatically know it.


     Checkers? Don't be silly. Monopoly is more a game of chance. I don't know how to play Shogi, so you can't be right. 

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #12

    caseyFgriffin

    No.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #13

    checkmateibeatu

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 23 months ago · Quote · #14

    checkmateibeatu

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 23 months ago · Quote · #15

    bobbyDK

    in denmark they have talked about making chess compulsory cause students who study chess gets better at math.
    I don't know if it has been decided.
    but I doubt that these 2 girls on the video would have acted a lof differently since they should have learned the value of what is yours and mine in their upbringing.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #17

    Flamma_Aquila

    I don't think chess has any inherent benefit that a lot of things wouldn't have. Chess is simply a discipline, that requires a different manner of systematic thinking. Would it benefit most people? Perhaps. But so would reading, sudoku, poker, and most any other mental activity.

    The other side is, it won't do any benefit at all if you don't put the time and effort in, and that requires some love of it. Who is going to do tactics exercises or endgame practice or opening study for hours if they don't love the game? It would just be another thing at school that kids ignore.

    That is the true value of any extra curricular activity. They all contain lessons and benefits, even "soft" skills like teamwork, work ethic, determination, etc. But it doesn't work if you force it, they have to want it.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #18

    bolshevikhellraiser

    I think I'm in love!

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #19

    PrawnEatsPrawn

    Reb wrote:

    The fact that those two girls exhibited no shame/remorse for what they did bothers me more than what they actually did. It tells me they will probably do it again, or something worse.... 


     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS2Y3W5T4zM&feature=player_embedded

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #20

    bigpoison

    Reb wrote:

    The fact that those two girls exhibited no shame/remorse for what they did bothers me more than what they actually did. It tells me they will probably do it again, or something worse.... 


    But, Rex, "money's money."  It is what it is. 

    Around and 'round we go.


Back to Top

Post your reply: