11868 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Sometimes when I play Live Chess, I play well enough that my opponent is in no position to win. Instead of resigning, some of them either leave the computer and let their time run out, making me sit and wait for the game to finish. Some turn off their computers and the chat window states that they have disconnected. One opponent had the nerve to write "Fck u azzwhole" in the window and let their time run out.
Is there anything we can do about these twerps?
block 'em - it easy
Just let them lose (by running their time out), and don't play them again.
In the case of abusive language, report the abuse.
The moderators can track bad language. As MontyII said, you should report them for abuse if you feel you need to.
MontyII wrote: Just let them lose (by running their time out), and don't play them again. In the case of abusive language, report the abuse. Other ideas?yeah that's right
I think MontyII has the best idea.
Ive found quite a few people will just disconnect. Its pathetic.
I wouldn't be so fast blaming the people disconnect. I got disconnected from the live chess server more than once. There are all kind of reasons for that, from user losing wireless strength to live chess server technical problems. I can understand why it would bother you if your opponent keeps you waiting thirty minutes till his time runs out, but why do you take disconnects too personal? When your opponent gets disconnected for any reason, server soon aborts that game anyway.
yup report abuse, but remember one thing - there is NO WAY for staff to determine if an individual disconnect was intentional or due to some technical glitch.
Now if a particular player seems to disconnect a lot in lost positions that would be different, but just so you know - disconnects can happen at anytime. For me, it seemed to occur most often when I was winning and somehow I was blamed for abandoning a won game (and got scored with a loss).
You were not blamed for abandoning a won game. You got disconnected and that results in a forfeit if you don't get back in a certain time. That answers the "somehow".
You keep on bringing it up again and again. Why? It's a random event and the fact that you were winning the game at the time has nothing to do with anything. The server does not have it in for you!
When players disconnect at the moment when they realize they know they cannot win--when they know it, and you know it--a timely disconnection is unlikely an accident. They just need to suck it up and resign.
Maybe not if they're physically pulling their network connection out, but if they're just closing the window or navigating away those events can absolutely be captured and logged by chess.com.
How do you know at what moment they've realized their position is lost? I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but you can't know really this and coincidences also occur.
There are those players who go so far as to make you play out a completely won K + Q vs K endgame. I consider that bad sportsmanship as well.
I'm surprised it would be so much work but the point is that it could be done. Your first post said there was "NO WAY".
Think about it. Take snapshots as a game progresses, there will be instances where one side is winning, one side losing or maybe the position is drawish. Now add in random disconnects. You're always going to have someone who is losing, winning or drawing when that disconnect occurs.
Sure, so if you mapped out the statistical distribution for random disconnects, you would find that (when the game isn't drawish) they're winning half the time and losing half the time. That's all good and well.
But there are a plethora of dodgy types whose distribution is going to have a massive stack of disconnects when they're losing, on top of that random spread. They're defying the odds! That's the kind of behaviour that people are rightfully annoyed by, and you always seem to want to downplay the more than fair possibility that the disconnect is a vindictive act.
I think you give people too much credit
If we added up all the snapshots as you say, there's absolutely no doubt that the player who is losing will be the more frequent disconnector. It is not going to be 50/50. You forgot to mention that we have to also include the source of the disconnect in the analysis, not just that there was one.
If someone occasionally gets upset and lets the clock run down when they are losing, I'd say that is poor sportsmanship but hardly an offence that warrants reporting or banning. It is different with types who make it a 'strategy' to start long games and then let the clock run down.
If you don't know the opponent personally, it is probably better not to accept very long time controls. Instead, use shorter base time with longer increments.
There is nothing we can, or really should do, about these folk, (apart from cases of abusive language). Of course, if you feel like being an annoying moron back to them, I always find a fun method of reversing the irritation is to offer a draw when they have 1 second left.
when I know somebody playin' a bit unnatural, I suspects they is usin' an engine, an' I drags out the time in the hope that the staff will catch 'em - they is remarkably efficient in that regard
.... and that 100% of the games where I got disconnected I was either winning or the position was inconclusive. That's been my experience.
I must be missing something because I don't understand the meaning or relevance of this?
Are you telling us that you're an unlucky person? I'm sorry I don't get it.
It must be significant because you've said the same thing several times in this and similar topics.
Only three things are certain in life: Death, taxes and resignation threads.
12/10/2013 - Easterwood-Williams 2004
by nicolemanglicmot 5 minutes ago
no email confirmation sent
by cavity_explorer 5 minutes ago
Unique chess gifts
by chessgamesshop 11 minutes ago
World Chess Champion Magnus Carlsen says I fear nobody....
by sandygomez09 12 minutes ago
Posted Latest Version of ChessX Database Program
by DaPie 14 minutes ago
Is there a chess opening that pisses you off?
by TiMePaRaDoX_73 15 minutes ago
by Aberfalman 17 minutes ago
Official Chess Troll of the Year!
by ConnorMacleod_151 26 minutes ago
what do play against 1.e4 d5
by FirebrandX 27 minutes ago
What's the quickest way to get a title?
by NM-Dale 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!