16378 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
That'll be right!
Maybe they should just go ahead, and abolish chess altogether, so people will stop bitching about it.
Yeah, people like the OP here will find some quirk in the rules to complain about.
About a year ago I was pounding a young guy in an OTB endgame he was sure to lose.
He offered what appeared to be a blunder, and I fell for his stalemate during our time scramble. Now a year later he is rated 200-300 points above me.
Why shouldn't a smart kid (or anyone else) be able to take clever advantage of the stalemate rule. More power to him.
The OP to this thread is simply lame. Give it up, please.
Probably been said, but this one is easy.
The goal of chess is to checkmate. Stalemate is not checkmate.
And lame syllogisms reign supreme among Chessnuts! No surprises there.
Had to look that one up.....Deductive reasoning, deceptive argument.
Theres one for the box.
IF Pigs could fly, THEN pork would surely be a low fat food. Q.E.D.
Whoever doesnt like the rules of chess should just quit, dont change the rules according to what you want. And btw, Stalemate wont become abolished, it will take to much work to do it, for the whole world I mean.
Notice the title of the thread. It says it NEEDS to be abolished, but it doesn't NEED to. He only wants it to. Nothing bad happens if it doesn't get abolished. So the title of the thread is wrong and the thread should be ignored!
I have surveyed many of my casual chess playing friends on this issue over the years. The general consensus among them is they would take the game more seriously if the stalemate rule was abolished as suggested. They claim among the unbrainwashed casual everyday citizen, the rule is obviously counter intuitive and plainly wrong. The object of the game is to trap the king. Stalemate = trapped king = win. It's really just common sense.
The guy that wrote the title probably didnt expect this much attention. Itll of been a retortion of a rule that caught him out. But all the same these rule change threads certainly get the attention. An absurd kinda thing. Ive heard that before somewhere...
What's next? This same argument regarding perpetual check?
"Well, my forces were vastly superior and he has to keep moving the same piece back and forth, so clearly, it's a win for me."
I was thinking maybe...128 squares
63 squares is more interesting.
It's checkmate that should be abolished.
are you stupid?
If you read the whole thread you'll see that all this has been answered many times.
I personally never met a chess player concerned about stalemate rule which indicates that it is not an issue.
I think the two key words there are "casual" and "friends". Casual because real chessplayers do not seriously want to take out a basic rule like that. Friends will agree to what their friends say if reasonably put, more often than not. I am sure you didn't stop to weigh the pros and cons of the argument. A conversation on the lines of "How stupid is this: you are surrounded but we draw?" does not count as surveying. Actually polling a large number of opinions of serious chessplayers would count as surveying.
When I was a beginner I once trapped the king without check and i thought i won.
I've never surveyed my casual (nor initmate) friends for anything ever.
Carlsen is mediocre - my analyses
by pfren 5 minutes ago
Question about Indian defences
by acejackneo 5 minutes ago
by Klutt_McNutt 5 minutes ago
by ViktorHNielsen 6 minutes ago
I do not have a connection
by ilgambittoo 7 minutes ago
What books centered on defense would you recommend?
by ViktorHNielsen 8 minutes ago
12/4/2013 - Immunity
by Zoras 9 minutes ago
Daeth Opining: The Future of Chess?
by SDET 10 minutes ago
Positional response to e4?
by Ziryab 11 minutes ago
2200 vs 2700
by Rumo75 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!