16489 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
amritaji , even after queenz exchange black was in one piece advantage .... white was still loosing anyways ...so he resigned ......and three ways are by queen and by two pawns.....
surely it was great move:)
marvelous!!!!!!! also c Nezhmetdinov vs Chernikov, 1962!!!!!! Wonderful queen sacrifice :)
thanks ChristianSoldier007 !!
anytime! I saw it a while back and was facinated, so I analyzed all the lines I could find and put it up here. Truly a great work of art!
While extremely impressive, 23...Qg3! is hardly unique: 23...Qe3! is equally strong (but less impressive), and also Black has four more "pedestrian" ways to win.
Marshall's 18...Qxc3? would make any modern GM to scream in despair at the "noob" that was moving the Black pieces.
why do you always have to be a downer pfren?
Because 18...Qxc3 is simply a very bad move, which drops virtually all of Black's large advantage, and which would be considered only by an attack-crazed guy like Marshall- that's why.
why dont you look at the beauty of Qg3 rather than the non-beauty of Qxc3?
pfren is like one who criticizes everything but never appreciates anything.
And I criticized your opinions right now.
23. ... Qe3! doesn't force a mate if White defends his Queen and moves it.
Marshall 21 move was Rh6.
I would have played Rxf!!.
i dont know how that is a good move. why didn'y he take the queen
Actually your 22.Ree1 loses a king in four moves: 22...Rxf1+ 23.Rxf1+ Qe3+ etc.
And yes, 21...Rxf2 is stronger than 21...Rh6 (although both are winning easily, so it hardly matters).
Beautiful move, but I still consider Shirov's Bh3 (as black in the position below) against Topalov in Linares 98 the most amazing move of all time. It gives me goosebumps every time I see it. I would give a new symbol to that move instead of using a handful of exclamation marks :)
What player in his right mind would have bet on Levitsky. Marshall was one of the top ten in the world. He had played Lasker for the world championship. He didnt do too well but only the elite play for the champiopnship. When Estragon says Levitsky won the Russian championship---the Russian championship was a zero, nada, a nothing event in those days.
The tournament tables of Breslau 1912 tells a story. Levitsky finished towards the bottom and Marshall finished towards the top. Everybody remembers Marshall--- and Levitsky is only footnote in chess history.
I very seriously believe the locals were not that stupid. Besides, didnt Carrie, his wife, say the story was ficticious.
There was no "top ten" in those days. Marshall had one credible finish in international play in San Sebastian the year before, but other than that nothing to distinguish himself, while Levitsky had been playing high level tournaments for a dozen years and turned in several good results.
If the spectators were fans of Levitsky, placing side bets on him would not have been unusual at the time. Of course, it is just not possible that a husband would forget to tell his wife about the extra money he made gambling, even if she disapproved of the habit.
There is no doubt the legend of spectators spontaneously showering the board with gold pieces is untrue, but most legends have at least some grain of truth in their origins, and the exaggeration of a bet being paid off into an appreciation of the beauty of the move seems not much of a stretch.
Anyone want to practise French exchange variation?
by Fixing_A_Hole 2 minutes ago
Chess improvement Technique for beginners:Problem to visualize
by roT- 5 minutes ago
Who's your fav in the Top Ten?
by upen2002 6 minutes ago
do Americans really see Bobby as one of the greatest players
by Darth_Algar 6 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by Reb 11 minutes ago
Online chess ratings - Timeouts and cheaters
by steve_bute 15 minutes ago
Is There a Game Analysis that Tells You How Strong You Played?
by Hoople212 16 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by AKAL1 23 minutes ago
9/20/2014 - Going For The Touchdown
by maacos 27 minutes ago
Beat 1500+ (I'm under 900) ELO. What do you think?
by Scottrf 43 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!